Haitai Solar JT715SLkB vs Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96
VS
The verdict
JT715SLkB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.23 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
15 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JT715SLkB
CETC-435TR(GDF)/96
Difference
Module efficiency
23.00 %
21.77 %
1.23 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
715 Wp
435 Wp
280 W more power
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
217.7 Wp/m²
12.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight
37.3 kg
23.9 kg
13.4 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
50.45 V
34.54 V
15.91 V apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Short-circuit current
17.61 A
16.05 A
1.56 A apart
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Weight per kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
54.9 kg/kWp
2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
42.55 V
28.60 V
13.95 V apart
Cell count
132
96
36 cells apart
Current at max power
16.81 A
15.21 A
1.60 A apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JT715SLkB
23,990 kWh
CETC-435TR(GDF)/96
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,395 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JT715SLkB
CETC-435TR(GDF)/96
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
435 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
689 W
415 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
664 W
396 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
638 W
376 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JT715SLkB
CETC-435TR(GDF)/96
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
435 Wp
+280 W for JT715SLkB
Module efficiency
23.00 %
21.77 %
+1.23 pp for JT715SLkB
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
217.7 Wp/m²
+12.5 Wp/m² for JT715SLkB
Open-circuit voltage
50.45 V
34.54 V
15.91 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.55 V
28.60 V
13.95 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.61 A
16.05 A
1.56 A apart
Current at max power
16.81 A
15.21 A
1.60 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for JT715SLkB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
37.3 kg
23.9 kg
-13.4 kg for CETC-435TR(GDF)/96
Weight per kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
54.9 kg/kWp
-2.8 kg/kWp for JT715SLkB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for JT715SLkB
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by Haitai Solar
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
96
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,970
vs
#7,297
JT715SLkB leads by 5,327 places
Power density
#2,070
vs
#7,129
JT715SLkB leads by 5,059 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#6,152
JT715SLkB leads by 6,139 places
Weight
#5,676
vs
#9,400
JT715SLkB leads by 3,724 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#450
vs
#10,207
JT715SLkB leads by 9,757 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT720SLkB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT710SLkB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT705SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT700SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT695SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT690SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Haitai Solar JT715SLkB or Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96?
According to our database: Haitai Solar JT715SLkB has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 21.77%); Haitai Solar JT715SLkB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Haitai Solar JT715SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96?
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96 is 21.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Haitai Solar JT715SLkB use vs Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96?
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB uses HJT cells; Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Haitai Solar JT715SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96?
Haitai Solar JT715SLkB has a 30 years power warranty; Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Haitai Solar JT715SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96 bifacial panels?
Both Haitai Solar JT715SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
