Skip to main content
JT695SLkB vs CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 4 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Haitai Solar JT695SLkB vs Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96

Haitai Solar JT695SLkB
Haitai Solar
JT695SLkB
695 Wp 22.40 % HJT Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Haitai Solar
CETC-455TR(GDF)/96
455 Wp 22.77 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JT695SLkB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.060 %/°C better in heat. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
4 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

14 of 18 parameters
Parameter JT695SLkB CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 695 Wp 455 Wp 240 W more power
Weight 37.3 kg 23.9 kg 13.4 kg lighter
Module efficiency 22.40 % 22.77 % 0.37 pp more efficient
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 49.85 V 34.80 V 15.05 V apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² 4.0 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Short-circuit current 17.37 A 16.29 A 1.08 A apart
Voltage at max power 41.95 V 29.45 V 12.50 V apart
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Current at max power 16.57 A 15.45 A 1.12 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JT695SLkB
23,319 kWh
CETC-455TR(GDF)/96
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,053 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JT695SLkB CETC-455TR(GDF)/96
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 695 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 670 W 435 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 645 W 414 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 620 W 394 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JT695SLkB CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 695 Wp 455 Wp +240 W for JT695SLkB
Module efficiency 22.40 % 22.77 % +0.37 pp for CETC-455TR(GDF)/96
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² +4.0 Wp/m² for CETC-455TR(GDF)/96
Open-circuit voltage 49.85 V 34.80 V 15.05 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.95 V 29.45 V 12.50 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.37 A 16.29 A 1.08 A apart
Current at max power 16.57 A 15.45 A 1.12 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for JT695SLkB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 37.3 kg 23.9 kg -13.4 kg for CETC-455TR(GDF)/96
Weight per kWp 53.7 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for JT695SLkB
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by Haitai Solar
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,834 vs #3,129
CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 leads by 1,705 places
Power density
#4,939 vs #2,943
CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 leads by 1,996 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #6,152
JT695SLkB leads by 6,139 places
Weight
#7,764 vs #6,178
CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 leads by 1,586 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,087 vs #8,685
JT695SLkB leads by 7,598 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT720SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT715SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT710SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT705SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT700SLkB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT690SLkB
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Haitai Solar JT695SLkB or Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96?
According to our database: Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 has higher module efficiency (22.77% vs 22.40%); Haitai Solar JT695SLkB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Haitai Solar JT695SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96?
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 is 22.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Haitai Solar JT695SLkB use vs Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96?
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB uses HJT cells; Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Haitai Solar JT695SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96?
Haitai Solar JT695SLkB has a 30 years power warranty; Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Haitai Solar JT695SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 bifacial panels?
Both Haitai Solar JT695SLkB and Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.