Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 vs Haitai Solar JT720SLkB
VS
The verdict
JT720SLkB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.93 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CETC-445TR(GDF)/96
JT720SLkB
Difference
Module efficiency
22.27 %
23.20 %
0.93 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
445 Wp
720 Wp
275 W more power
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
9.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight
23.9 kg
37.3 kg
13.4 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
34.67 V
50.60 V
15.93 V apart
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Short-circuit current
16.17 A
17.67 A
1.50 A apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Voltage at max power
29.03 V
42.70 V
13.67 V apart
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Current at max power
15.33 A
16.87 A
1.54 A apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CETC-445TR(GDF)/96
14,931 kWh
JT720SLkB
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,226 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CETC-445TR(GDF)/96
JT720SLkB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
445 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
425 W
694 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
405 W
668 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
385 W
642 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CETC-445TR(GDF)/96
JT720SLkB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
445 Wp
720 Wp
+275 W for JT720SLkB
Module efficiency
22.27 %
23.20 %
+0.93 pp for JT720SLkB
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+9.1 Wp/m² for JT720SLkB
Open-circuit voltage
34.67 V
50.60 V
15.93 V apart
Voltage at max power
29.03 V
42.70 V
13.67 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.17 A
17.67 A
1.50 A apart
Current at max power
15.33 A
16.87 A
1.54 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for JT720SLkB
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
23.9 kg
37.3 kg
-13.4 kg for CETC-445TR(GDF)/96
Weight per kWp
53.7 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for JT720SLkB
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by Haitai Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,544
vs
#1,349
JT720SLkB leads by 4,195 places
Power density
#5,365
vs
#1,390
JT720SLkB leads by 3,975 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#13
JT720SLkB leads by 6,139 places
Weight
#7,799
vs
#5,201
JT720SLkB leads by 2,598 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,522
vs
#334
JT720SLkB leads by 9,188 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 vs Haitai Solar CETC-455TR(GDF)/96
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 vs Haitai Solar CETC-450TR(GDF)/96
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 vs Haitai Solar CETC-440TR(GDF)/96
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 vs Haitai Solar CETC-435TR(GDF)/96
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT720SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT715SLkB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Haitai Solar
Haitai Solar JT720SLkB vs Haitai Solar JT710SLkB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 or Haitai Solar JT720SLkB?
According to our database: Haitai Solar JT720SLkB has higher module efficiency (23.20% vs 22.27%); Haitai Solar JT720SLkB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 and Haitai Solar JT720SLkB?
Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 has a module efficiency of 22.27%, while Haitai Solar JT720SLkB is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 use vs Haitai Solar JT720SLkB?
Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 uses TOPCon cells; Haitai Solar JT720SLkB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 and Haitai Solar JT720SLkB?
Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 has a 30 years power warranty; Haitai Solar JT720SLkB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 and Haitai Solar JT720SLkB bifacial panels?
Both Haitai Solar CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 and Haitai Solar JT720SLkB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
