Skip to main content
NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430

NT12R/54BGDF-510W
510 Wp 22.92 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
430 Wp 21.52 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.40 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter NT12R/54BGDF-510W GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 Difference
Module efficiency 22.92 % 21.52 % 1.40 pp more efficient
Rated power 510 Wp 430 Wp 80 W more power
Power density 229.2 Wp/m² 215.2 Wp/m² 14.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight 27.3 kg 21.5 kg 5.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 40.90 V 34.78 V 6.12 V apart
Module area 2.225 m² 1.998 m² 0.227 m² apart
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 3.5 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 34.49 V 29.27 V 5.22 V apart
Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart
Dimensions 1962x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1962x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NT12R/54BGDF-510W
17,112 kWh
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
14,427 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,685 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NT12R/54BGDF-510W GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 510 W 430 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 488 W 411 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 466 W 393 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 443 W 374 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NT12R/54BGDF-510W GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 510 Wp 430 Wp +80 W for NT12R/54BGDF-510W
Module efficiency 22.92 % 21.52 % +1.40 pp for NT12R/54BGDF-510W
Power density 229.2 Wp/m² 215.2 Wp/m² +14.0 Wp/m² for NT12R/54BGDF-510W
Open-circuit voltage 40.90 V 34.78 V 6.12 V apart
Voltage at max power 34.49 V 29.27 V 5.22 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.47 A 15.44 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.79 A 14.69 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1962x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1962x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.225 m² 1.998 m² 0.227 m² apart
Weight 27.3 kg 21.5 kg -5.8 kg for GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp -3.5 kg/kWp for GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,350 vs #7,853
NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads by 5,503 places
Power density
#2,369 vs #7,816
NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads by 5,447 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,509 vs #3,317
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 leads by 4,192 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,391 vs #10,352
NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads by 3,961 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL GCL-NT12R/54GDF-530
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL NT12R/54GDF-525W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL GCL-NT12R/54GDF-525
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-520W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL NT12R/54GDF-520W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W vs GCL GCL-NT12R/54GDF-520
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W or GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430?
According to our database: GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W has higher module efficiency (22.92% vs 21.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W and GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430?
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W has a module efficiency of 22.92%, while GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 is 21.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W use vs GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430?
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W uses TOPCon cells; GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W and GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430?
GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W has a 30 years power warranty; GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W and GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 bifacial panels?
Both GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W and GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.