Skip to main content
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs NT12R/54BGDF-510W 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W

GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
430 Wp 21.52 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
NT12R/54BGDF-510W
510 Wp 22.92 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.40 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 NT12R/54BGDF-510W Difference
Module efficiency 21.52 % 22.92 % 1.40 pp more efficient
Rated power 430 Wp 510 Wp 80 W more power
Power density 215.2 Wp/m² 229.2 Wp/m² 14.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight 21.5 kg 27.3 kg 5.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 34.78 V 40.90 V 6.12 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.225 m² 0.227 m² apart
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 3.5 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 29.27 V 34.49 V 5.22 V apart
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1962x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1962x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
14,427 kWh
NT12R/54BGDF-510W
17,112 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,685 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 NT12R/54BGDF-510W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 430 W 510 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 411 W 488 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 393 W 466 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 374 W 443 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 NT12R/54BGDF-510W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 430 Wp 510 Wp +80 W for NT12R/54BGDF-510W
Module efficiency 21.52 % 22.92 % +1.40 pp for NT12R/54BGDF-510W
Power density 215.2 Wp/m² 229.2 Wp/m² +14.0 Wp/m² for NT12R/54BGDF-510W
Open-circuit voltage 34.78 V 40.90 V 6.12 V apart
Voltage at max power 29.27 V 34.49 V 5.22 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.44 A 15.47 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.69 A 14.79 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1962x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1962x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.225 m² 0.227 m² apart
Weight 21.5 kg 27.3 kg -5.8 kg for GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp -3.5 kg/kWp for GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,853 vs #2,350
NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads by 5,503 places
Power density
#7,816 vs #2,369
NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads by 5,447 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317 vs #7,509
GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 leads by 4,192 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,352 vs #6,391
NT12R/54BGDF-510W leads by 3,961 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-520W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-515W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-505W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-500W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-495W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 vs GCL GCL-NT12R/48GDF
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 or GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W?
According to our database: GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W has higher module efficiency (22.92% vs 21.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 and GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W?
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 has a module efficiency of 21.52%, while GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W is 22.92%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 use vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W?
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 uses TOPCon cells; GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 and GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W?
GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 and GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510W bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12R/48BGDF-430 and GCL NT12R/54BGDF-510 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.