Skip to main content
GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs NT12/66GDF-725 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725

GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625
625 Wp 23.14 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
GCL NT12/66GDF-725
NT12/66GDF-725
725 Wp 23.34 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NT12/66GDF-725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 100 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 NT12/66GDF-725 Difference
Rated power 625 Wp 725 Wp 100 W more power
Weight 32.5 kg 38.3 kg 5.8 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 16.00 A 18.60 A 2.60 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Module efficiency 23.14 % 23.34 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Current at max power 15.20 A 17.67 A 2.47 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625
20,970 kWh
NT12/66GDF-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 NT12/66GDF-725
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 625 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 598 W 693 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 571 W 662 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 543 W 630 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 NT12/66GDF-725 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 625 Wp 725 Wp +100 W for NT12/66GDF-725
Module efficiency 23.14 % 23.34 % +0.20 pp for NT12/66GDF-725
Power density 231.4 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.55 V 48.80 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.12 V 41.03 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.00 A 18.60 A 2.60 A apart
Current at max power 15.20 A 17.67 A 2.47 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 38.3 kg -5.8 kg for GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,554 vs #981
NT12/66GDF-725 leads by 573 places
Power density
#1,558 vs #974
NT12/66GDF-725 leads by 584 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,449 vs #6,570
GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 leads by 1,121 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,266 vs #410
NT12/66GDF-725 leads by 1,856 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-730
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-725
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 725
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 or GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
According to our database: GCL NT12/66GDF-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.14%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 has a module efficiency of 23.14%, while GCL NT12/66GDF-725 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 use vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 uses TOPCon cells; GCL NT12/66GDF-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725?
GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL NT12/66GDF-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725 bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 and GCL NT12/66GDF-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.