Skip to main content
NT12/66GDF-740 vs NT12R/66GDF-625 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
740 Wp 23.82 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625
625 Wp 23.14 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NT12/66GDF-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.68 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter NT12/66GDF-740 NT12R/66GDF-625 Difference
Module efficiency 23.82 % 23.14 % 0.68 pp more efficient
Rated power 740 Wp 625 Wp 115 W more power
Weight 38.2 kg 32.5 kg 5.7 kg lighter
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² 6.8 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current 18.72 A 16.00 A 2.72 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Current at max power 17.79 A 15.20 A 2.59 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NT12/66GDF-740
24,828 kWh
NT12R/66GDF-625
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,858 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NT12/66GDF-740 NT12R/66GDF-625
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 740 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 708 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 676 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 643 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NT12/66GDF-740 NT12R/66GDF-625 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 740 Wp 625 Wp +115 W for NT12/66GDF-740
Module efficiency 23.82 % 23.14 % +0.68 pp for NT12/66GDF-740
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² +6.8 Wp/m² for NT12/66GDF-740
Open-circuit voltage 49.46 V 48.55 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.60 V 41.12 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.72 A 16.00 A 2.72 A apart
Current at max power 17.79 A 15.20 A 2.59 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 38.2 kg 32.5 kg -5.7 kg for NT12R/66GDF-625
Weight per kWp 51.6 kg/kWp 52.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#447 vs #1,554
NT12/66GDF-740 leads by 1,107 places
Power density
#460 vs #1,558
NT12/66GDF-740 leads by 1,098 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,026 vs #5,449
NT12/66GDF-740 leads by 423 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#181 vs #2,266
NT12/66GDF-740 leads by 2,085 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 or GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625?
According to our database: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has higher module efficiency (23.82% vs 23.14%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has a module efficiency of 23.82%, while GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 is 23.14%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 use vs GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 uses TOPCon cells; GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740 and GCL GCL-NT12R/66GDF-625 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.