Skip to main content
GKA210N132-735 vs GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20) 6 of 15 identical Swap Change panels

Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)

Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735
Gamko New Energy
GKA210N132-735
735 Wp 23.66 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Gamko New Energy
GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)
400 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

GKA210N132-735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.66 pp more efficient. 6 of 15 comparable parameters are identical, with 4 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
6 of 15 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

9 of 15 parameters
Parameter GKA210N132-735 GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20) Difference
Module efficiency 23.66 % 23.00 % 0.66 pp more efficient
Rated power 735 Wp 400 Wp 335 W more power
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 207.7 Wp/m² 28.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.0 kg 18.0 kg 14.0 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 19.40 A 9.73 A 9.67 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.925 m² 1.181 m² apart
Current at max power 18.48 A 9.27 A 9.21 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2188x880x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2188x880x30 mm
Voltage at max power 39.77 V 40.99 V 1.22 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Projected at 25 °C. Not published by Gamko New Energy, so a hotter case cannot be shown without inventing one side of it.
GKA210N132-735
24,661 kWh
GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)
13,421 kWh
Lifetime gap
11,240 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GKA210N132-735 GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W -
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 698 W -
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 660 W -
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 623 W -
03

Full specification

Parameter GKA210N132-735 GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 400 Wp +335 W for GKA210N132-735
Module efficiency 23.66 % 23.00 % +0.66 pp for GKA210N132-735
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 207.7 Wp/m² +28.9 Wp/m² for GKA210N132-735
Open-circuit voltage 47.72 V 47.14 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 39.77 V 40.99 V 1.22 V apart
Short-circuit current 19.40 A 9.73 A 9.67 A apart
Current at max power 18.48 A 9.27 A 9.21 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C - Not published by Gamko New Energy
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2188x880x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2188x880x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.925 m² 1.181 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 18.0 kg -14.0 kg for GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)
Weight per kWp 43.5 kg/kWp 45.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs - Not published by Gamko New Energy
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr - Not published by Gamko New Energy
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 - Not published by Gamko New Energy
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#634 vs #1,970
GKA210N132-735 leads by 1,336 places
Power density
#614 vs #10,606
GKA210N132-735 leads by 9,992 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846 vs #14,048
GKA210N132-735 leads by 5,202 places
Weight
#307 vs #574
GKA210N132-735 leads by 267 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#226 vs #11,349
GKA210N132-735 leads by 11,123 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-750
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-745
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-740
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 or Gamko New Energy GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)?
According to our database: Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 and Gamko New Energy GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)?
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while Gamko New Energy GKA210M400 W (1/2*4*20) is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 use vs Gamko New Energy GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)?
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 uses TOPCon cells; Gamko New Energy GKA210M400 W (1/2*4*20) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 and Gamko New Energy GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20)?
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 has a 30 years power warranty; Gamko New Energy GKA210M400 W (1/2*4*20) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 and Gamko New Energy GKA210M400W (1/2*4*20) bifacial panels?
Both Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735 and Gamko New Energy GKA210M400 W (1/2*4*20) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.