Skip to main content
720W vs 720W (series) 18 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)

Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W
Gamko New Energy
GKA210N132-720W
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)
Gamko New Energy
GKA210N132-720W (series)
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 18 comparable parameters agree, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
18 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

0 of 18 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
720W
23,898 kWh
720W (series)
23,898 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 720W 720W (series)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 683 W 683 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 647 W 647 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 610 W 610 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 720W 720W (series) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 720 Wp Same
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.18 % Same
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 47.11 V 47.11 V Same
Voltage at max power 38.91 V 38.91 V Same
Short-circuit current 19.43 A 19.43 A Same
Current at max power 18.50 A 18.50 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x30 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 32.0 kg 32.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 44.4 kg/kWp 44.4 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.46 %/yr - Not published by Gamko New Energy
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,468 vs #1,468
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#1,390 vs #1,390
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#8,846 vs #8,846
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#447 vs #447
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#510 vs #510
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-750
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-745
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-740
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-735
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gamko New Energy
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-730
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W or Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W and Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)?
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W (series) is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W use vs Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)?
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W uses TOPCon cells; Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W (series) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W and Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series)?
Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W has a 30 years power warranty; Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W (series) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W and Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720W (series) bifacial panels?
Both Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W and Gamko New Energy GKA210N132-720 W (series) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.