FuturaSun FU 575 MV vs FuturaSun FU 450 M
VS
The verdict
14 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
575 MV
450 M
Difference
Rated power
575 Wp
450 Wp
125 W more power
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
32.0 kg
21.3 kg
10.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
8.3 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency
22.20 %
22.52 %
0.32 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
50.86 V
35.47 V
15.39 V apart
Module area
2.583 m²
1.998 m²
0.585 m² apart
Short-circuit current
14.40 A
15.97 A
1.57 A apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power
42.19 V
30.01 V
12.18 V apart
Cell count
144
96
48 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Current at max power
13.63 A
15.00 A
1.37 A apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
575 MV
19,292 kWh
450 M
15,098 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,194 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
575 MV
450 M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
575 W
450 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
550 W
430 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
525 W
411 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
500 W
391 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
575 MV
450 M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
575 Wp
450 Wp
+125 W for 575 MV
Module efficiency
22.20 %
22.52 %
+0.32 pp for 450 M
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
225.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
50.86 V
35.47 V
15.39 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.19 V
30.01 V
12.18 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.40 A
15.97 A
1.57 A apart
Current at max power
13.63 A
15.00 A
1.37 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
1.998 m²
0.585 m² apart
Weight
32.0 kg
21.3 kg
-10.7 kg for 450 M
Weight per kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
-8.3 kg/kWp for 450 M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for 575 MV
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
96
48 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,881
vs
#4,167
450 M leads by 1,714 places
Power density
#5,612
vs
#4,284
450 M leads by 1,328 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,101
vs
#1,641
450 M leads by 8,460 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
575 MV leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#4,457
vs
#9,413
575 MV leads by 4,956 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
FuturaSun
FuturaSun FU 575 MV vs FuturaSun FU 720 MV
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
FuturaSun
FuturaSun FU 575 MV vs FuturaSun FU 710 MV
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
FuturaSun
FuturaSun FU 575 MV vs FuturaSun FU 700 MV
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
FuturaSun
FuturaSun FU 575 MV vs FuturaSun FU 590 MV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
FuturaSun
FuturaSun FU 575 MV vs FuturaSun FU 585 MV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
FuturaSun
FuturaSun FU 575 MV vs FuturaSun FU 580 MV
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: FuturaSun FU 575 MV or FuturaSun FU 450 M?
According to our database: FuturaSun FU 450 M has higher module efficiency (22.52% vs 22.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of FuturaSun FU 575 MV and FuturaSun FU 450 M?
FuturaSun FU 575 MV has a module efficiency of 22.20%, while FuturaSun FU 450 M is 22.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does FuturaSun FU 575 MV use vs FuturaSun FU 450 M?
FuturaSun FU 575 MV uses TOPCon cells; FuturaSun FU 450 M uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on FuturaSun FU 575 MV and FuturaSun FU 450 M?
FuturaSun FU 575 MV has a 30 years power warranty; FuturaSun FU 450 M has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are FuturaSun FU 575 MV and FuturaSun FU 450 M bifacial panels?
FuturaSun FU 575 MV is bifacial (captures light from both faces); FuturaSun FU 450 M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 8 FuturaSun offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.