First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 vs First Solar FS-7525A-TR1
VS
The verdict
7535A-TR1 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 13 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 5 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
5 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
7535A-TR1
7525A-TR1
Difference
Module efficiency
19.10 %
18.80 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Power density
191.3 Wp/m²
187.7 Wp/m²
3.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
535 Wp
525 Wp
10 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
227.20 V
226.10 V
1.10 V apart
Voltage at max power
187.80 V
186.00 V
1.80 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.320 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
7535A-TR1
18,037 kWh
7525A-TR1
17,700 kWh
Lifetime gap
337 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
7535A-TR1
7525A-TR1
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
535 W
525 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.2% of rated power
509 W
500 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.4% of rated power
484 W
475 W
Hot roof
70 °C
85.6% of rated power
458 W
449 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
7535A-TR1
7525A-TR1
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
535 Wp
525 Wp
+10 W for 7535A-TR1
Module efficiency
19.10 %
18.80 %
+0.30 pp for 7535A-TR1
Power density
191.3 Wp/m²
187.7 Wp/m²
+3.6 Wp/m² for 7535A-TR1
Open-circuit voltage
227.20 V
226.10 V
1.10 V apart
Voltage at max power
187.80 V
186.00 V
1.80 V apart
Short-circuit current
3.06 A
3.04 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
2.85 A
2.82 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.320 %/°C
-0.320 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2300x1216x49 mm
2300x1216x49 mm
Same
Module area
2.797 m²
2.797 m²
Same
Weight
39.7 kg
39.7 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
74.2 kg/kWp
75.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.30 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
CdTe
CdTe
Same
Cell type
Thin film
Thin film
Same
Cell count
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,993
vs
#13,125
7535A-TR1 leads by 132 places
Power density
#12,973
vs
#13,113
7535A-TR1 leads by 140 places
Heat behaviour
#8,376
vs
#8,376
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#13,707
vs
#13,750
7535A-TR1 leads by 43 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,106
vs
#10,546
7535A-TR1 leads by 440 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
First Solar
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 vs First Solar FS-7550A-TR1
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
First Solar
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 vs First Solar FS-7545A-TR1
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
First Solar
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 vs First Solar FS-7540A-TR1
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
First Solar
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 vs First Solar FS-7530A-TR1
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
First Solar
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 vs First Solar FS-7520A-TR1
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
First Solar
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 vs First Solar FS-7515A-TR1
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 or First Solar FS-7525A-TR1?
According to our database: First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 has higher module efficiency (19.10% vs 18.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 and First Solar FS-7525A-TR1?
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 has a module efficiency of 19.10%, while First Solar FS-7525A-TR1 is 18.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 use vs First Solar FS-7525A-TR1?
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 uses CdTe cells; First Solar FS-7525A-TR1 uses CdTe. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 and First Solar FS-7525A-TR1?
First Solar FS-7535A-TR1 has a 30 years power warranty; First Solar FS-7525A-TR1 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
