Skip to main content
E710HCBG 132-T vs E600HCBG144-T 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E600HCBG144-T

Emmvee
E710HCBG 132-T
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Emmvee
E600HCBG144-T
600 Wp 23.23 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

E600HCBG144-T leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 110 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter E710HCBG 132-T E600HCBG144-T Difference
Rated power 710 Wp 600 Wp 110 W more power
Weight 37.8 kg 32.0 kg 5.8 kg lighter
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.23 % 0.37 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 14.61 A 3.91 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 48.32 V 52.27 V 3.95 V apart
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² 3.7 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 17.70 A 13.89 A 3.81 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 40.13 V 43.23 V 3.10 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E710HCBG 132-T
23,822 kWh
E600HCBG144-T
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,691 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E710HCBG 132-T E600HCBG144-T
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 600 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 679 W 574 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 648 W 548 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 617 W 522 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E710HCBG 132-T E600HCBG144-T Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 600 Wp +110 W for E710HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.23 % +0.37 pp for E600HCBG144-T
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² +3.7 Wp/m² for E600HCBG144-T
Open-circuit voltage 48.32 V 52.27 V 3.95 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.13 V 43.23 V 3.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 14.61 A 3.91 A apart
Current at max power 17.70 A 13.89 A 3.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 37.8 kg 32.0 kg -5.8 kg for E600HCBG144-T
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,536 vs #1,252
E600HCBG144-T leads by 1,284 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #1,252
E600HCBG144-T leads by 1,222 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,077 vs #7,236
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 159 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#855 vs #2,935
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 2,080 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T or Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E600HCBG144-T has higher module efficiency (23.23% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Emmvee E600HCBG144-T is 23.23%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T use vs Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E600HCBG144-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E600HCBG144-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E600HCBG144-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.