Skip to main content
E600HCBG144-T vs E710HCBG 132-T 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee E600HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T

Emmvee
E600HCBG144-T
600 Wp 23.23 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Emmvee
E710HCBG 132-T
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

E600HCBG144-T leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 110 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter E600HCBG144-T E710HCBG 132-T Difference
Rated power 600 Wp 710 Wp 110 W more power
Weight 32.0 kg 37.8 kg 5.8 kg lighter
Module efficiency 23.23 % 22.86 % 0.37 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current 14.61 A 18.52 A 3.91 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 52.27 V 48.32 V 3.95 V apart
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 3.7 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 13.89 A 17.70 A 3.81 A apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 43.23 V 40.13 V 3.10 V apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E600HCBG144-T
20,131 kWh
E710HCBG 132-T
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,691 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E600HCBG144-T E710HCBG 132-T
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 574 W 679 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 548 W 648 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 522 W 617 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E600HCBG144-T E710HCBG 132-T Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 710 Wp +110 W for E710HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency 23.23 % 22.86 % +0.37 pp for E600HCBG144-T
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +3.7 Wp/m² for E600HCBG144-T
Open-circuit voltage 52.27 V 48.32 V 3.95 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.23 V 40.13 V 3.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.61 A 18.52 A 3.91 A apart
Current at max power 13.89 A 17.70 A 3.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 37.8 kg -5.8 kg for E600HCBG144-T
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,252 vs #2,536
E600HCBG144-T leads by 1,284 places
Power density
#1,252 vs #2,474
E600HCBG144-T leads by 1,222 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,236 vs #7,077
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 159 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,935 vs #855
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 2,080 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee E600HCBG144-T or Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E600HCBG144-T has higher module efficiency (23.23% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E600HCBG144-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T has a module efficiency of 23.23%, while Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E600HCBG144-T use vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E600HCBG144-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E600HCBG144-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E600HCBG144-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E600HCBG144-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.