Skip to main content
580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs 565NT72-HL/BF-DG 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG

EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG
EGing PV
EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG
580 Wp 22.45 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG
EGing PV
EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG
565 Wp 21.87 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

580NT72-HL/BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 580NT72-HL/BF-DG 565NT72-HL/BF-DG Difference
Module efficiency 22.45 % 21.87 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 218.7 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 580 Wp 565 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
580NT72-HL/BF-DG
19,460 kWh
565NT72-HL/BF-DG
18,957 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 580NT72-HL/BF-DG 565NT72-HL/BF-DG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 580 W 565 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 554 W 540 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 528 W 514 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 502 W 489 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 580NT72-HL/BF-DG 565NT72-HL/BF-DG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 580 Wp 565 Wp +15 W for 580NT72-HL/BF-DG
Module efficiency 22.45 % 21.87 % +0.58 pp for 580NT72-HL/BF-DG
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 218.7 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for 580NT72-HL/BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 51.42 V 50.87 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.71 V 42.17 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.37 A 14.19 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.58 A 13.40 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 31.7 kg 31.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.7 kg/kWp 56.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,680 vs #6,971
580NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 2,291 places
Power density
#4,607 vs #6,904
580NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 2,297 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,133 vs #10,478
580NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,345 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,604 vs #5,747
580NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,143 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-580NT72-HLV
4 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HLV
5 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-570NT72-HL/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-570NT72-HLV
7 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV
7 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG or EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG?
According to our database: EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG has higher module efficiency (22.45% vs 21.87%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG has a module efficiency of 22.45%, while EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG is 21.87%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG use vs EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG bifacial panels?
Both EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 EGing PV offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.