Skip to main content
575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs 565NT72-HLV 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV

EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG
EGing PV
EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG
575 Wp 22.25 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV
EGing PV
EG-565NT72-HLV
565 Wp 21.87 % TOPCon
The verdict

575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter 575NT72-HL/BF-DG 565NT72-HLV Difference
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Weight 31.7 kg 27.0 kg 4.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 55.1 kg/kWp 47.8 kg/kWp 7.3 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 22.25 % 21.87 % 0.38 pp more efficient
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 218.7 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 575 Wp 565 Wp 10 W more power
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
575NT72-HL/BF-DG
19,292 kWh
565NT72-HLV
18,957 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 575NT72-HL/BF-DG 565NT72-HLV
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 575 W 565 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 549 W 540 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 523 W 514 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 497 W 489 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 575NT72-HL/BF-DG 565NT72-HLV Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 575 Wp 565 Wp +10 W for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG
Module efficiency 22.25 % 21.87 % +0.38 pp for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 218.7 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 51.24 V 50.85 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.53 V 41.98 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.31 A 14.25 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.52 A 13.46 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 31.7 kg 27.0 kg -4.7 kg for 565NT72-HLV
Weight per kWp 55.1 kg/kWp 47.8 kg/kWp -7.3 kg/kWp for 565NT72-HLV
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for 575NT72-HL/BF-DG
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,752 vs #6,971
575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,219 places
Power density
#5,612 vs #6,904
575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,292 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,652 vs #1,908
565NT72-HLV leads by 7,744 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,912
575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#4,996 vs #6,723
575NT72-HL/BF-DG leads by 1,727 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-580NT72-HLV
5 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-580NT72-HL/BF-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-575NT72-HLV
4 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-570NT72-HL/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-570NT72-HLV
4 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-565NT72-HL/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG or EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV?
According to our database: EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG has higher module efficiency (22.25% vs 21.87%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV?
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG has a module efficiency of 22.25%, while EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV is 21.87%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG use vs EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV?
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV?
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV bifacial panels?
EGing PV EG-575NT72-HL/BF-DG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); EGing PV EG-565NT72-HLV is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 3 EGing PV offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.