DH156NA-650W vs DH132NC-700 7 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700

Q: Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.50%); DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

DAS Solar

DAS-DH156NA-650W

650 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

DAS Solar

DAS-DH132NC-700

700 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

DH156NA-650W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 11 differences

How alike are they

7 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs not published

What actually differs

11 of 18 parameters

Parameter DH156NA-650W DH132NC-700 Difference

Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.50 % 0.80 pp more efficient

Rated power 650 Wp 700 Wp 50 W more power

Weight 34.3 kg 38.3 kg 4.0 kg lighter

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat

Power density 232.5 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 7.2 Wp/m² higher

Open-circuit voltage 56.55 V 48.52 V 8.03 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.59 A 18.34 A 3.75 A apart

Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart

Voltage at max power 46.97 V 40.42 V 6.55 V apart

Current at max power 13.84 A 17.32 A 3.48 A apart

Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

DH156NA-650W

21,809 kWh

DH132NC-700

23,486 kWh

Lifetime gap

1,677 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario DH156NA-650W DH132NC-700

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 700 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 621 W 671 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 592 W 641 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 562 W 612 W

Full specification

Parameter DH156NA-650W DH132NC-700 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 650 Wp 700 Wp +50 W for DH132NC-700

Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.50 % +0.80 pp for DH156NA-650W

Power density 232.5 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +7.2 Wp/m² for DH156NA-650W

Open-circuit voltage 56.55 V 48.52 V 8.03 V apart

Voltage at max power 46.97 V 40.42 V 6.55 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.59 A 18.34 A 3.75 A apart

Current at max power 13.84 A 17.32 A 3.48 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for DH132NC-700

Mechanical

Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart

Weight 34.3 kg 38.3 kg -4.0 kg for DH156NA-650W

Weight per kWp 52.8 kg/kWp 54.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count - 132 Not published by DAS Solar

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#1,057 vs #4,281

DH156NA-650W leads by 3,224 places

Power density

#1,265 vs #4,048

DH156NA-650W leads by 2,783 places

Heat behaviour

#6,152 vs #1,347

DH132NC-700 leads by 4,805 places

Weight

#6,504 vs #9,185

DH156NA-650W leads by 2,681 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#1,333 vs #958

DH132NC-700 leads by 375 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-640W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-635W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-630W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.50%); DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.