Skip to main content
705 vs 695 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695

DAH Solar
DAS-DH132NC-705
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAH Solar
DAS-DH132NC-695
695 Wp 22.40 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

705 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 705 695 Difference
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.40 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 705 Wp 695 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
705
23,654 kWh
695
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 705 695
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 675 W 666 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 646 W 637 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 616 W 607 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 705 695 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 695 Wp +10 W for 705
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.40 % +0.30 pp for 705
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for 705
Open-circuit voltage 48.72 V 48.32 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.62 V 40.23 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.38 A 18.30 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.36 A 17.28 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 55.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#3,364 vs #4,834
705 leads by 1,470 places
Power density
#3,418 vs #4,939
705 leads by 1,521 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,684 vs #9,615
705 leads by 931 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#759 vs #1,098
705 leads by 339 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-710
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-725
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-720
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 or DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?
According to our database: DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 use vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 bifacial panels?
Both DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 7 DAH Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.