Skip to main content
695 vs 700 18 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700

DAH Solar
DAS-DH132NC-695
695 Wp 22.40 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAH Solar
DAS-DH132NC-700
700 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 18 comparable parameters agree, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
18 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

0 of 18 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
695
23,319 kWh
700
23,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 695 700
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 695 W 700 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 666 W 671 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 637 W 641 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 607 W 612 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 695 700 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 695 Wp 700 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.40 % 22.50 % Effectively the same
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.32 V 48.52 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.23 V 40.42 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.30 A 18.34 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.28 A 17.32 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.1 kg/kWp 54.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,834 vs #4,281
700 leads by 553 places
Power density
#4,939 vs #4,048
700 leads by 891 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,615 vs #9,185
700 leads by 430 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,098 vs #958
700 leads by 140 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-725
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-720
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 or DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?
According to our database: DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 use vs DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700?
DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 bifacial panels?
Both DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 and DAH Solar DAS-DH132NC-700 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 7 DAH Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.