DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615W
VS
The verdict
625Z16/DG(BW) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.37 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
3 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
625Z16/DG(BW)
66Z16/DG-615W
Difference
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.77 %
0.37 pp more efficient
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
3.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
625 Wp
615 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
625Z16/DG(BW)
20,970 kWh
66Z16/DG-615W
20,634 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
625Z16/DG(BW)
66Z16/DG-615W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
615 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
598 W
588 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
571 W
561 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
543 W
535 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
625Z16/DG(BW)
66Z16/DG-615W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
615 Wp
+10 W for 625Z16/DG(BW)
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.77 %
+0.37 pp for 625Z16/DG(BW)
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
+3.7 Wp/m² for 625Z16/DG(BW)
Open-circuit voltage
48.60 V
49.20 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.30 V
41.10 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.00 A
15.94 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.01 A
14.90 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
32.5 kg
32.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
52.0 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,554
vs
#3,129
625Z16/DG(BW) leads by 1,575 places
Power density
#1,558
vs
#3,132
625Z16/DG(BW) leads by 1,574 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,449
vs
#6,602
625Z16/DG(BW) leads by 1,153 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,853
vs
#2,394
625Z16/DG(BW) leads by 541 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-620Z16/DG(BW)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-615Z16/DG(BW)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-605Z16/DG(BW)
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-600Z16/DG(BW)
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW)
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) or DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615W?
According to our database: DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) has higher module efficiency (23.14% vs 22.77%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615W?
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) has a module efficiency of 23.14%, while DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615 W is 22.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) use vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615W?
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615W?
DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615W bifacial panels?
Both DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-66Z16/DG-615 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 7 DAH Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.