DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW)
VS
The verdict
610Z16/DG(BW) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.55 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
3 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
595Z16/DG(BW)
610Z16/DG(BW)
Difference
Module efficiency
22.03 %
22.58 %
0.55 pp more efficient
Power density
220.3 Wp/m²
225.8 Wp/m²
5.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
595 Wp
610 Wp
15 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
595Z16/DG(BW)
19,963 kWh
610Z16/DG(BW)
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
595Z16/DG(BW)
610Z16/DG(BW)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
610 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
569 W
583 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
543 W
557 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
517 W
530 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
595Z16/DG(BW)
610Z16/DG(BW)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
610 Wp
+15 W for 610Z16/DG(BW)
Module efficiency
22.03 %
22.58 %
+0.55 pp for 610Z16/DG(BW)
Power density
220.3 Wp/m²
225.8 Wp/m²
+5.6 Wp/m² for 610Z16/DG(BW)
Open-circuit voltage
47.40 V
47.80 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.10 V
40.70 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.64 A
15.82 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.77 A
14.88 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
32.5 kg
32.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
54.6 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#6,369
vs
#3,887
610Z16/DG(BW) leads by 2,482 places
Power density
#6,362
vs
#3,788
610Z16/DG(BW) leads by 2,574 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,059
vs
#7,200
610Z16/DG(BW) leads by 1,859 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,959
vs
#2,745
610Z16/DG(BW) leads by 1,214 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-625Z16/DG(BW)
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-620Z16/DG(BW)
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-615Z16/DG(BW)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-605Z16/DG(BW)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-600Z16/DG(BW)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) vs DAH Solar DHN-590Z16/DG(BW)
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) or DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW)?
According to our database: DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW) has higher module efficiency (22.58% vs 22.03%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW)?
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) has a module efficiency of 22.03%, while DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW) is 22.58%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) use vs DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW)?
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW)?
DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW) bifacial panels?
Both DAH Solar DHN-595Z16/DG(BW) and DAH Solar DHN-610Z16/DG(BW) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 7 DAH Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.