Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG
VS
The verdict
CS7N-640MB-AG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CS3W-445MB-AG
CS7N-640MB-AG
Difference
Module efficiency
19.90 %
20.60 %
0.70 pp more efficient
Rated power
445 Wp
640 Wp
195 W more power
Weight
28.4 kg
37.9 kg
9.5 kg lighter
Power density
199.2 Wp/m²
206.0 Wp/m²
6.9 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
48.90 V
44.60 V
4.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
11.54 A
18.31 A
6.77 A apart
Module area
2.234 m²
3.106 m²
0.872 m² apart
Weight per kWp
63.8 kg/kWp
59.2 kg/kWp
4.6 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Current at max power
10.89 A
17.07 A
6.18 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
40.90 V
37.50 V
3.40 V apart
Dimensions
2132x1048x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2132x1048x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CS3W-445MB-AG
14,931 kWh
CS7N-640MB-AG
21,473 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,542 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CS3W-445MB-AG
CS7N-640MB-AG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
445 W
640 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
422 W
607 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
398 W
575 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
375 W
542 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CS3W-445MB-AG
CS7N-640MB-AG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
445 Wp
640 Wp
+195 W for CS7N-640MB-AG
Module efficiency
19.90 %
20.60 %
+0.70 pp for CS7N-640MB-AG
Power density
199.2 Wp/m²
206.0 Wp/m²
+6.9 Wp/m² for CS7N-640MB-AG
Open-circuit voltage
48.90 V
44.60 V
4.30 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.90 V
37.50 V
3.40 V apart
Short-circuit current
11.54 A
18.31 A
6.77 A apart
Current at max power
10.89 A
17.07 A
6.18 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for CS7N-640MB-AG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2132x1048x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2132x1048x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.234 m²
3.106 m²
0.872 m² apart
Weight
28.4 kg
37.9 kg
-9.5 kg for CS3W-445MB-AG
Weight per kWp
63.8 kg/kWp
59.2 kg/kWp
-4.6 kg/kWp for CS7N-640MB-AG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.45 %/yr
Not published by Canadian Solar
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,331
vs
#11,093
CS7N-640MB-AG leads by 1,238 places
Power density
#12,319
vs
#11,100
CS7N-640MB-AG leads by 1,219 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#8,778
CS7N-640MB-AG leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#12,932
vs
#12,053
CS7N-640MB-AG leads by 879 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11,245
vs
#4,656
CS7N-640MB-AG leads by 6,589 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-670MB-AG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-665MB-AG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-655MB-AG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-650MB-AG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG or Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG has higher module efficiency (20.60% vs 19.90%); Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG has a module efficiency of 19.90%, while Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG is 20.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG use vs Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG uses PERC cells; Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG bifacial panels?
Both Canadian Solar CS3W-445MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 40 Canadian Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

