Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC
VS
The verdict
575-H-HC leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.46 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
575-H-HC
540-H-HC
Difference
Module efficiency
22.26 %
20.80 %
1.46 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
208.1 Wp/m²
14.5 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
0.20 %/yr slower
Rated power
575 Wp
540 Wp
35 W more power
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Weight per kWp
50.3 kg/kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
52.23 V
49.89 V
2.34 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2288x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2288x1134x35 mm
Voltage at max power
44.34 V
42.40 V
1.94 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
575-H-HC
19,292 kWh
540-H-HC
17,263 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,029 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
575-H-HC
540-H-HC
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
575 W
540 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
549 W
512 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
523 W
483 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
497 W
455 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
575-H-HC
540-H-HC
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
575 Wp
540 Wp
+35 W for 575-H-HC
Module efficiency
22.26 %
20.80 %
+1.46 pp for 575-H-HC
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
208.1 Wp/m²
+14.5 Wp/m² for 575-H-HC
Open-circuit voltage
52.23 V
49.89 V
2.34 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.34 V
42.40 V
1.94 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.84 A
13.55 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
12.97 A
12.76 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for 575-H-HC
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2288x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2288x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.595 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
28.9 kg
28.9 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
50.3 kg/kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
-3.3 kg/kWp for 575-H-HC
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for 575-H-HC
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
-0.20 %/yr for 575-H-HC
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,656
vs
#10,533
575-H-HC leads by 4,877 places
Power density
#5,612
vs
#10,536
575-H-HC leads by 4,924 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#10,489
575-H-HC leads by 4,337 places
Weight
#3,713
vs
#7,557
575-H-HC leads by 3,844 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
575-H-HC leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#4,922
vs
#9,101
575-H-HC leads by 4,179 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-560-H-HC
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-550-H-HC
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC or Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC?
According to our database: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 20.80%); Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC has a module efficiency of 22.26%, while Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC is 20.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC use vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC uses TOPCon cells; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC has a 30 years power warranty; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC bifacial panels?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Boviet Solar BVM7612M-540-H-HC is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Boviet Solar offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.