Skip to main content
455TGB/108WB vs 705TGB/132TS 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB vs Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS

Axitec
AC-455TGB/108WB
455 Wp 22.29 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Axitec
AC-705TGB/132TS
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

705TGB/132TS leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 250 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter 455TGB/108WB 705TGB/132TS Difference
Rated power 455 Wp 705 Wp 250 W more power
Weight 25.3 kg 38.0 kg 12.7 kg lighter
Module efficiency 22.29 % 22.70 % 0.41 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 39.68 V 48.32 V 8.64 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.51 A 18.47 A 3.96 A apart
Module area 2.041 m² 3.106 m² 1.065 m² apart
Power density 222.9 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 4.0 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 32.98 V 40.62 V 7.64 V apart
Current at max power 13.80 A 17.36 A 3.56 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
455TGB/108WB
15,266 kWh
705TGB/132TS
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,388 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 455TGB/108WB 705TGB/132TS
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 455 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 434 W 672 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 413 W 639 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 392 W 607 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 455TGB/108WB 705TGB/132TS Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 455 Wp 705 Wp +250 W for 705TGB/132TS
Module efficiency 22.29 % 22.70 % +0.41 pp for 705TGB/132TS
Power density 222.9 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +4.0 Wp/m² for 705TGB/132TS
Open-circuit voltage 39.68 V 48.32 V 8.64 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.98 V 40.62 V 7.64 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.51 A 18.47 A 3.96 A apart
Current at max power 13.80 A 17.36 A 3.56 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 2.041 m² 3.106 m² 1.065 m² apart
Weight 25.3 kg 38.0 kg -12.7 kg for 455TGB/108WB
Weight per kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 53.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,439 vs #3,364
705TGB/132TS leads by 2,075 places
Power density
#5,162 vs #3,418
705TGB/132TS leads by 1,744 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,071 vs #8,105
705TGB/132TS leads by 1,966 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,309 vs #83
705TGB/132TS leads by 5,226 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB vs Axitec AC-460TGB/108WB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB vs Axitec AC-450TGB/108WB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB vs Axitec AC-445TGB/108WB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-710TGB/132TS
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-695TGB/132TS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB or Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS?
According to our database: Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.29%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB and Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS?
Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB has a module efficiency of 22.29%, while Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB use vs Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS?
Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB uses TOPCon cells; Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB and Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS?
Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB has a 30 years power warranty; Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB and Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS bifacial panels?
Both Axitec AC-455TGB/108WB and Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 Axitec offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.