Skip to main content
AVN66G12RG-630 vs ASM-M12-132-635 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635

Avaada
AVN66G12RG-630
630 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Adani Solar
ASM-M12-132-635
635 Wp 20.39 % PERC
The verdict

AVN66G12RG-630 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.91 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter AVN66G12RG-630 ASM-M12-132-635 Difference
Module efficiency 23.30 % 20.39 % 2.91 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density 233.2 Wp/m² 203.9 Wp/m² 29.3 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.55 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 48.60 V 43.08 V 5.52 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 18.63 A 2.58 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.114 m² 0.413 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power 41.65 V 36.82 V 4.83 V apart
Current at max power 15.12 A 17.25 A 2.13 A apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2390x1303x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm vs 2390x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AVN66G12RG-630
21,138 kWh
ASM-M12-132-635
20,580 kWh
Lifetime gap
558 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AVN66G12RG-630 ASM-M12-132-635
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 630 W 635 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 602 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 573 W 570 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 545 W 538 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AVN66G12RG-630 ASM-M12-132-635 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 630 Wp 635 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.30 % 20.39 % +2.91 pp for AVN66G12RG-630
Power density 233.2 Wp/m² 203.9 Wp/m² +29.3 Wp/m² for AVN66G12RG-630
Open-circuit voltage 48.60 V 43.08 V 5.52 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.65 V 36.82 V 4.83 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 18.63 A 2.58 A apart
Current at max power 15.12 A 17.25 A 2.13 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for AVN66G12RG-630
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2390x1303x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm vs 2390x1303x35 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.114 m² 0.413 m² apart
Weight 34.0 kg 33.6 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 54.0 kg/kWp 52.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.55 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for AVN66G12RG-630
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #11,683
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 10,666 places
Power density
#1,003 vs #11,623
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 10,620 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #8,778
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 2,685 places
Weight
#8,163 vs #6,627
ASM-M12-132-635 leads by 1,536 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,991 vs #4,963
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 2,972 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12G
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12TB
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12RTB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12RG-625
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12RG-620
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12RG-615
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 or Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635?
According to our database: Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 20.39%); Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 and Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635?
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 is 20.39%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 use vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635?
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 uses TOPCon cells; Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 and Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635?
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 has a 30 years power warranty; Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 and Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 bifacial panels?
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare Avaada and Adani Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 2 Adani Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.