Skip to main content
ASM-M12-132-635 vs AVN66G12RG-630 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 vs Avaada AVN66G12RG-630

Adani Solar
ASM-M12-132-635
635 Wp 20.39 % PERC
VS
Avaada
AVN66G12RG-630
630 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

AVN66G12RG-630 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.91 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter ASM-M12-132-635 AVN66G12RG-630 Difference
Module efficiency 20.39 % 23.30 % 2.91 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density 203.9 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² 29.3 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 43.08 V 48.60 V 5.52 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.63 A 16.05 A 2.58 A apart
Module area 3.114 m² 2.701 m² 0.413 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power 36.82 V 41.65 V 4.83 V apart
Current at max power 17.25 A 15.12 A 2.13 A apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2390x1303x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm 2390x1303x35 mm vs 2382x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
ASM-M12-132-635
20,580 kWh
AVN66G12RG-630
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
558 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ASM-M12-132-635 AVN66G12RG-630
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 635 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 603 W 602 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 570 W 573 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 538 W 545 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ASM-M12-132-635 AVN66G12RG-630 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 635 Wp 630 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 20.39 % 23.30 % +2.91 pp for AVN66G12RG-630
Power density 203.9 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² +29.3 Wp/m² for AVN66G12RG-630
Open-circuit voltage 43.08 V 48.60 V 5.52 V apart
Voltage at max power 36.82 V 41.65 V 4.83 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.63 A 16.05 A 2.58 A apart
Current at max power 17.25 A 15.12 A 2.13 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for AVN66G12RG-630
Mechanical
Dimensions 2390x1303x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm 2390x1303x35 mm vs 2382x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.114 m² 2.701 m² 0.413 m² apart
Weight 33.6 kg 34.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 52.9 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for AVN66G12RG-630
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#11,683 vs #1,017
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 10,666 places
Power density
#11,623 vs #1,003
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 10,620 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #6,093
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 2,685 places
Weight
#6,627 vs #8,163
ASM-M12-132-635 leads by 1,536 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,963 vs #1,991
AVN66G12RG-630 leads by 2,972 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-645
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-640
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-630
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12G
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Avaada
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 vs Avaada AVN66G12TB
6 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 or Avaada AVN66G12RG-630?
According to our database: Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 20.39%); Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 and Avaada AVN66G12RG-630?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 has a module efficiency of 20.39%, while Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 use vs Avaada AVN66G12RG-630?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 uses PERC cells; Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 and Avaada AVN66G12RG-630?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 has a 30 years power warranty; Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 and Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 bifacial panels?
Avaada AVN66G12RG-630 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare Adani Solar and Avaada as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 2 Adani Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.