Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
VS
The verdict
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.40 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Difference
Module efficiency
22.40 %
24.80 %
2.40 pp more efficient
Rated power
605 Wp
670 Wp
65 W more power
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
24.1 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
47.8 kg/kWp
7.6 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
33.5 kg
32.0 kg
1.5 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
15.86 A
16.87 A
1.01 A apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Current at max power
14.69 A
16.09 A
1.40 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605
20,299 kWh
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,356 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
579 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
552 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
526 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
670 Wp
+65 W for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Module efficiency
22.40 %
24.80 %
+2.40 pp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
+24.1 Wp/m² for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Open-circuit voltage
48.59 V
49.58 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.18 V
41.65 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.86 A
16.87 A
1.01 A apart
Current at max power
14.69 A
16.09 A
1.40 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
33.5 kg
32.0 kg
-1.5 kg for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Weight per kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
47.8 kg/kWp
-7.6 kg/kWp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,774
vs
#12
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 4,762 places
Power density
#4,780
vs
#14
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 4,766 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#9,806
vs
#1,884
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 7,922 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,097
vs
#295
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ leads by 2,802 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-665
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-660
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-655
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-650
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 or Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 22.40%); Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 use vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ?
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BH-605 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

