Skip to main content
640W vs 645W 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W

Amerisolar
AS-8M132-HC-640W
640 Wp 20.60 % PERC
VS
Amerisolar
AS-8M132-HC-645W
645 Wp 20.76 % PERC
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
640W
20,460 kWh
645W
20,619 kWh
Lifetime gap
159 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 640W 645W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 640 W 645 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 607 W 612 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 575 W 579 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 542 W 546 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 640W 645W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 640 Wp 645 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 20.60 % 20.76 % Effectively the same
Power density 206.0 Wp/m² 207.6 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 45.10 V 45.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 37.30 V 37.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.26 A 18.31 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.16 A 17.20 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 34.0 kg 34.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.1 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 20 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.60 %/yr 0.60 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#11,172 vs #10,690
645W leads by 482 places
Power density
#11,181 vs #10,638
645W leads by 543 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846 vs #8,846
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,974 vs #6,416
645W leads by 558 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,945 vs #2,596
645W leads by 349 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-665W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-660W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-655W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-650W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-585
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W or Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
According to our database: Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645 W has higher module efficiency (20.76% vs 20.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W and Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640 W has a module efficiency of 20.60%, while Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645 W is 20.76%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W use vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640 W uses PERC cells; Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640W and Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-640 W has a 30 years power warranty; Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 3 Amerisolar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.