Skip to main content
7M144N-HC-560 vs 7M144-HC-550 10 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550

Amerisolar
AS-7M144N-HC-560
560 Wp 21.67 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Amerisolar
AS-7M144-HC-550
550 Wp 21.28 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

7M144N-HC-560 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.060 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
10 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

8 of 18 parameters
Parameter 7M144N-HC-560 7M144-HC-550 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.360 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 21.67 % 21.28 % 0.39 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 3.6 kg/kWp lighter
Power density 216.7 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Weight 27.5 kg 29.0 kg 1.5 kg lighter
Rated power 560 Wp 550 Wp 10 W more power
Dimensions 2279x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
7M144N-HC-560
18,789 kWh
7M144-HC-550
18,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
632 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 7M144N-HC-560 7M144-HC-550
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 560 W 550 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.6% of rated power 535 W 520 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.2% of rated power 510 W 491 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.8% of rated power 484 W 461 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 7M144N-HC-560 7M144-HC-550 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 560 Wp 550 Wp +10 W for 7M144N-HC-560
Module efficiency 21.67 % 21.28 % +0.39 pp for 7M144N-HC-560
Power density 216.7 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 7M144N-HC-560
Open-circuit voltage 50.40 V 50.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.20 V 41.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.04 A 13.94 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.28 A 13.16 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.360 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for 7M144N-HC-560
Mechanical
Dimensions 2279x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Module area 2.584 m² 2.584 m² Same
Weight 27.5 kg 29.0 kg -1.5 kg for 7M144N-HC-560
Weight per kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp -3.6 kg/kWp for 7M144N-HC-560
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 20 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by Amerisolar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#7,652 vs #8,863
7M144N-HC-560 leads by 1,211 places
Power density
#7,602 vs #8,709
7M144N-HC-560 leads by 1,107 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #12,425
7M144N-HC-560 leads by 6,273 places
Weight
#2,754 vs #6,427
7M144N-HC-560 leads by 3,673 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,435 vs #5,288
7M144N-HC-560 leads by 853 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-585
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-570
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 or Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
According to our database: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 has higher module efficiency (21.67% vs 21.28%); Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 and Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 has a module efficiency of 21.67%, while Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550 is 21.28%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 use vs Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 uses TOPCon cells; Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 and Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 has a 30 years power warranty; Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 3 Amerisolar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.