Skip to main content
BF10-545W-DG vs BF26-450W 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W

Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG
Aptos Solar
DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG
545 Wp 21.09 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W
Aptos Solar
DNA-144-BF26-450W
450 Wp 20.70 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

11 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 95 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter BF10-545W-DG BF26-450W Difference
Rated power 545 Wp 450 Wp 95 W more power
Weight 32.3 kg 24.1 kg 8.2 kg lighter
Module efficiency 21.09 % 20.70 % 0.39 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp 59.3 kg/kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 11.52 A 2.40 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 2.174 m² 0.410 m² apart
Temperature coefficient -0.335 %/°C -0.320 %/°C 0.015 %/°C better in heat
Power density 211.0 Wp/m² 207.0 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 12.38 A 10.93 A 1.45 A apart
Voltage at max power 44.00 V 41.20 V 2.80 V apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2094x1038x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2094x1038x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BF10-545W-DG
17,697 kWh
BF26-450W
14,608 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,089 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BF10-545W-DG BF26-450W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 545 W 450 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.0% of rated power 518 W 428 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.0% of rated power 490 W 407 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.9% of rated power 463 W 385 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BF10-545W-DG BF26-450W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 545 Wp 450 Wp +95 W for BF10-545W-DG
Module efficiency 21.09 % 20.70 % +0.39 pp for BF10-545W-DG
Power density 211.0 Wp/m² 207.0 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for BF10-545W-DG
Open-circuit voltage 49.65 V 49.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.00 V 41.20 V 2.80 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 11.52 A 2.40 A apart
Current at max power 12.38 A 10.93 A 1.45 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.335 %/°C -0.320 %/°C +0.015 %/°C for BF26-450W
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2094x1038x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2094x1038x35 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 2.174 m² 0.410 m² apart
Weight 32.3 kg 24.1 kg -8.2 kg for BF26-450W
Weight per kWp 59.3 kg/kWp 53.6 kg/kWp -5.7 kg/kWp for BF26-450W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.54 %/yr 0.54 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#9,587 vs #10,842
BF10-545W-DG leads by 1,255 places
Power density
#9,380 vs #10,902
BF10-545W-DG leads by 1,522 places
Heat behaviour
#8,821 vs #8,376
BF26-450W leads by 445 places
Weight
#12,183 vs #7,623
BF26-450W leads by 4,560 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,698 vs #7,413
BF10-545W-DG leads by 3,715 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-540W-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-445W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-440W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-460W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG or Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W?
According to our database: Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG has higher module efficiency (21.09% vs 20.70%); Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.320%/°C vs -0.335%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG has a module efficiency of 21.09%, while Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450 W is 20.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG use vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG uses PERC cells; Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG has a 30 years power warranty; Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450W bifacial panels?
Both Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF26-450 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 9 Aptos Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.