Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG
VS
The verdict
144-BF10-550W-DG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.72 pp more efficient. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
120-MF10-445W
144-BF10-550W-DG
Difference
Module efficiency
20.57 %
21.29 %
0.72 pp more efficient
Rated power
445 Wp
550 Wp
105 W more power
Weight
24.2 kg
32.3 kg
8.1 kg lighter
Power density
205.7 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
7.2 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
41.79 V
49.80 V
8.01 V apart
Module area
2.164 m²
2.583 m²
0.420 m² apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.335 %/°C
0.015 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp
54.4 kg/kWp
58.7 kg/kWp
4.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
35.03 V
44.15 V
9.12 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Short-circuit current
13.36 A
13.99 A
0.63 A apart
Dimensions
1908x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
1908x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
120-MF10-445W
14,445 kWh
144-BF10-550W-DG
17,859 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,414 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
120-MF10-445W
144-BF10-550W-DG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
445 W
550 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
422 W
522 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
398 W
495 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
375 W
467 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
120-MF10-445W
144-BF10-550W-DG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
445 Wp
550 Wp
+105 W for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Module efficiency
20.57 %
21.29 %
+0.72 pp for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Power density
205.7 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
+7.2 Wp/m² for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Open-circuit voltage
41.79 V
49.80 V
8.01 V apart
Voltage at max power
35.03 V
44.15 V
9.12 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.36 A
13.99 A
0.63 A apart
Current at max power
12.70 A
12.45 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.335 %/°C
+0.015 %/°C for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Mechanical
Dimensions
1908x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
1908x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.164 m²
2.583 m²
0.420 m² apart
Weight
24.2 kg
32.3 kg
-8.1 kg for 120-MF10-445W
Weight per kWp
54.4 kg/kWp
58.7 kg/kWp
-4.3 kg/kWp for 120-MF10-445W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.54 %/yr
0.54 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
144
Not published by Aptos Solar
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#11,187
vs
#8,708
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 2,479 places
Power density
#11,154
vs
#8,497
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 2,657 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#8,753
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 1,666 places
Weight
#8,683
vs
#11,864
120-MF10-445W leads by 3,181 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,700
vs
#3,247
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 4,453 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-460W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-455W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-450W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-540W-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W or Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
According to our database: Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.57%); Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.335%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445 W has a module efficiency of 20.57%, while Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W use vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445 W uses PERC cells; Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445 W has a 30 years power warranty; Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445W and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG bifacial panels?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-445 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 8 Aptos Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

