AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
15 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
CS7N-730TB-AG
Difference
Module efficiency
25.10 %
23.50 %
1.60 pp more efficient
Rated power
805 Wp
730 Wp
75 W more power
Power density
250.6 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
15.6 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
59.42 V
49.10 V
10.32 V apart
Module area
3.212 m²
3.106 m²
0.106 m² apart
Short-circuit current
17.13 A
18.79 A
1.66 A apart
Weight
39.8 kg
37.8 kg
2.0 kg lighter
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
49.46 V
41.20 V
8.26 V apart
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Weight per kWp
49.4 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
2.3 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
16.28 A
17.75 A
1.47 A apart
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
27,009 kWh
CS7N-730TB-AG
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,516 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
CS7N-730TB-AG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
805 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
774 W
698 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
742 W
666 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
711 W
635 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
CS7N-730TB-AG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
805 Wp
730 Wp
+75 W for AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
Module efficiency
25.10 %
23.50 %
+1.60 pp for AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
Power density
250.6 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
+15.6 Wp/m² for AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
Open-circuit voltage
59.42 V
49.10 V
10.32 V apart
Voltage at max power
49.46 V
41.20 V
8.26 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.13 A
18.79 A
1.66 A apart
Current at max power
16.28 A
17.75 A
1.47 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.212 m²
3.106 m²
0.106 m² apart
Weight
39.8 kg
37.8 kg
-2.0 kg for CS7N-730TB-AG
Weight per kWp
49.4 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
-2.3 kg/kWp for AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by AIKO
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3
vs
#749
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw leads by 746 places
Power density
#3
vs
#836
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw leads by 833 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#2,220
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#2,984
vs
#5,181
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw leads by 2,197 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1
vs
#316
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw leads by 315 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw or Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw has higher module efficiency (25.10% vs 23.50%); AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw has a module efficiency of 25.10%, while Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw use vs Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw uses Back Contact cells; Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG bifacial panels?
Both AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 135 AIKO offers · See 30 Canadian Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

