AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
VS
The verdict
A805-GRH78Dw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.10 pp more efficient. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
A620-MAH72Dw
A805-GRH78Dw
Difference
Module efficiency
24.00 %
25.10 %
1.10 pp more efficient
Rated power
620 Wp
805 Wp
185 W more power
Power density
240.0 Wp/m²
250.6 Wp/m²
10.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight
32.5 kg
39.8 kg
7.3 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
54.57 V
59.42 V
4.85 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.46 A
17.13 A
2.67 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
3.212 m²
0.629 m² apart
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
49.4 kg/kWp
3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
45.20 V
49.46 V
4.26 V apart
Current at max power
13.72 A
16.28 A
2.56 A apart
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A620-MAH72Dw
20,802 kWh
A805-GRH78Dw
27,009 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,207 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
A620-MAH72Dw
A805-GRH78Dw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
620 W
805 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
596 W
774 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
572 W
742 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
547 W
711 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
A620-MAH72Dw
A805-GRH78Dw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
620 Wp
805 Wp
+185 W for A805-GRH78Dw
Module efficiency
24.00 %
25.10 %
+1.10 pp for A805-GRH78Dw
Power density
240.0 Wp/m²
250.6 Wp/m²
+10.6 Wp/m² for A805-GRH78Dw
Open-circuit voltage
54.57 V
59.42 V
4.85 V apart
Voltage at max power
45.20 V
49.46 V
4.26 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.46 A
17.13 A
2.67 A apart
Current at max power
13.72 A
16.28 A
2.56 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
3.212 m²
0.629 m² apart
Weight
32.5 kg
39.8 kg
-7.3 kg for A620-MAH72Dw
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
49.4 kg/kWp
-3.0 kg/kWp for A805-GRH78Dw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by AIKO
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
Back Contact
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#329
vs
#3
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 326 places
Power density
#359
vs
#3
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 356 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#515
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,938
vs
#2,984
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 2,954 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,463
vs
#1
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 1,462 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A630-MAH72Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A625-MAH72Dw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A615-MAH72Dw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw or AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw has higher module efficiency (25.10% vs 24.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw has a module efficiency of 24.00%, while AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw is 25.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw use vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw bifacial panels?
Both AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 137 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.