AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw
VS
The verdict
A645-MAE72Mw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.40 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
A610-MAH72Mw
A645-MAE72Mw
Difference
Module efficiency
23.60 %
25.00 %
1.40 pp more efficient
Power density
236.1 Wp/m²
249.7 Wp/m²
13.5 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
610 Wp
645 Wp
35 W more power
Weight per kWp
46.2 kg/kWp
41.9 kg/kWp
4.4 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Weight
28.2 kg
27.0 kg
1.2 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
14.04 A
14.92 A
0.88 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
53.49 V
54.89 V
1.40 V apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Current at max power
13.56 A
14.16 A
0.60 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
A610-MAH72Mw
20,626 kWh
A645-MAE72Mw
21,809 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,183 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
A610-MAH72Mw
A645-MAE72Mw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
610 W
645 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
583 W
620 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
557 W
595 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
530 W
570 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
A610-MAH72Mw
A645-MAE72Mw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
610 Wp
645 Wp
+35 W for A645-MAE72Mw
Module efficiency
23.60 %
25.00 %
+1.40 pp for A645-MAE72Mw
Power density
236.1 Wp/m²
249.7 Wp/m²
+13.5 Wp/m² for A645-MAE72Mw
Open-circuit voltage
53.49 V
54.89 V
1.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
45.01 V
45.58 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.04 A
14.92 A
0.88 A apart
Current at max power
13.56 A
14.16 A
0.60 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for A645-MAE72Mw
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.583 m²
Same
Weight
28.2 kg
27.0 kg
-1.2 kg for A645-MAE72Mw
Weight per kWp
46.2 kg/kWp
41.9 kg/kWp
-4.4 kg/kWp for A645-MAE72Mw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#659
vs
#4
A645-MAE72Mw leads by 655 places
Power density
#656
vs
#9
A645-MAE72Mw leads by 647 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#515
A645-MAE72Mw leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#1,076
vs
#194
A645-MAE72Mw leads by 882 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,785
vs
#449
A645-MAE72Mw leads by 1,336 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-615-MAH72Mw
2 differences, the largest is cell technology
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A615-MAH72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-605-MAH72Mw
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw or AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw has higher module efficiency (25.00% vs 23.60%); AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw has a module efficiency of 23.60%, while AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw is 25.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw use vs AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw uses N-type cells; AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Mw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A645-MAE72Mw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 137 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.