Skip to main content
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs LR7-54HVB-485M 10 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M

AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
495 Wp 24.80 % Back Contact
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M
LR7-54HVB-485M
485 Wp 23.80 % N-type
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
10 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

8 of 18 parameters
Parameter AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw LR7-54HVB-485M Difference
Module efficiency 24.80 % 23.80 % 1.00 pp more efficient
Power density 247.7 Wp/m² 237.6 Wp/m² 10.1 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology Back Contact N-type Back Contact vs N-type
Module area 1.998 m² 2.041 m² 0.043 m² apart
Rated power 495 Wp 485 Wp 10 W more power
Weight per kWp 42.4 kg/kWp 44.5 kg/kWp 2.1 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 34.50 V 33.40 V 1.10 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
16,737 kWh
LR7-54HVB-485M
16,399 kWh
Lifetime gap
338 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw LR7-54HVB-485M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 495 W 485 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 476 W 466 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 456 W 447 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 437 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw LR7-54HVB-485M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 495 Wp 485 Wp +10 W for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Module efficiency 24.80 % 23.80 % +1.00 pp for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Power density 247.7 Wp/m² 237.6 Wp/m² +10.1 Wp/m² for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Open-circuit voltage 41.10 V 40.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 34.50 V 33.40 V 1.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.00 A 15.23 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.35 A 14.53 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.041 m² 0.043 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 21.6 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 42.4 kg/kWp 44.5 kg/kWp -2.1 kg/kWp for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs - Not published by Longi Solar
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact N-type Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#13 vs #462
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 449 places
Power density
#41 vs #525
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 484 places
Heat behaviour
#515 vs #515
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#219 vs #465
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 246 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,974 vs #8,820
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 4,846 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A490-MCE54Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Mw
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw or Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 23.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw and Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M?
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw use vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M?
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw uses Back Contact cells; Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw and Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M?
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Compare AIKO and Longi Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 137 AIKO offers · See 158 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.