AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.78 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Difference
Module efficiency
24.30 %
23.52 %
0.78 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
43.3 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
7.8 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
242.7 Wp/m²
235.2 Wp/m²
7.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight
21.0 kg
24.0 kg
3.0 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
36.87 V
4.03 V apart
Rated power
485 Wp
470 Wp
15 W more power
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Short-circuit current
14.88 A
15.85 A
0.97 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Voltage at max power
34.30 V
31.46 V
2.84 V apart
Current at max power
14.15 A
14.94 A
0.79 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
16,399 kWh
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
630 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
485 W
470 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
466 W
450 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
447 W
429 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
428 W
409 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
485 Wp
470 Wp
+15 W for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Module efficiency
24.30 %
23.52 %
+0.78 pp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Power density
242.7 Wp/m²
235.2 Wp/m²
+7.5 Wp/m² for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
36.87 V
4.03 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.30 V
31.46 V
2.84 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.88 A
15.85 A
0.97 A apart
Current at max power
14.15 A
14.94 A
0.79 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
21.0 kg
24.0 kg
-3.0 kg for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Weight per kWp
43.3 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
-7.8 kg/kWp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
+10 yrs for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#131
vs
#678
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb leads by 547 places
Power density
#140
vs
#674
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb leads by 534 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#287
vs
#4,393
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb leads by 4,106 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,797
vs
#6,415
AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb leads by 3,618 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Mb
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Mb
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Mb
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MCE54Mb
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Mb
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb or Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 23.52%); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU is 23.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb use vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb uses Back Contact cells; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers · See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

