AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw
VS
The verdict
11 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 180 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
A485-MCE54Mb
A665-MDE72Dw
Difference
Rated power
485 Wp
665 Wp
180 W more power
Weight
21.0 kg
33.0 kg
12.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
43.3 kg/kWp
49.6 kg/kWp
6.3 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
54.40 V
13.50 V apart
Module area
1.998 m²
2.701 m²
0.703 m² apart
Module efficiency
24.30 %
24.60 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Power density
242.7 Wp/m²
246.2 Wp/m²
3.5 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
34.30 V
45.60 V
11.30 V apart
Cell count
108
144
36 cells apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A485-MCE54Mb
16,399 kWh
A665-MDE72Dw
22,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,087 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
A485-MCE54Mb
A665-MDE72Dw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
485 W
665 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
466 W
639 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
447 W
613 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
428 W
587 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
A485-MCE54Mb
A665-MDE72Dw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
485 Wp
665 Wp
+180 W for A665-MDE72Dw
Module efficiency
24.30 %
24.60 %
+0.30 pp for A665-MDE72Dw
Power density
242.7 Wp/m²
246.2 Wp/m²
+3.5 Wp/m² for A665-MDE72Dw
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
54.40 V
13.50 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.30 V
45.60 V
11.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.88 A
15.24 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.15 A
14.59 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.701 m²
0.703 m² apart
Weight
21.0 kg
33.0 kg
-12.0 kg for A485-MCE54Mb
Weight per kWp
43.3 kg/kWp
49.6 kg/kWp
-6.3 kg/kWp for A485-MCE54Mb
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
+10 yrs for A485-MCE54Mb
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
Back Contact
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
144
36 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#145
vs
#58
A665-MDE72Dw leads by 87 places
Power density
#155
vs
#47
A665-MDE72Dw leads by 108 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#515
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#287
vs
#3,182
A485-MCE54Mb leads by 2,895 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,830
vs
#421
A665-MDE72Dw leads by 2,409 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Mb
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Mb
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Mb
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MCE54Mb
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Mb
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb or AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw has higher module efficiency (24.60% vs 24.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb and AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw is 24.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb use vs AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb and AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mb has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Dw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 147 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.