AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw vs JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.10 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
JAM66D45-620/LB
Difference
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.00 %
1.10 pp more efficient
Rated power
480 Wp
620 Wp
140 W more power
Power density
240.9 Wp/m²
229.5 Wp/m²
11.4 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
21.5 kg
33.1 kg
11.6 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
44.8 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
8.6 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
13 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
41.30 V
48.50 V
7.20 V apart
Module area
1.992 m²
2.701 m²
0.709 m² apart
Short-circuit current
14.38 A
16.13 A
1.75 A apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
34.86 V
40.21 V
5.35 V apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Current at max power
13.78 A
15.42 A
1.64 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1757x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1757x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
16,230 kWh
JAM66D45-620/LB
20,802 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,572 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
JAM66D45-620/LB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
480 W
620 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
461 W
593 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
443 W
566 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
424 W
539 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
JAM66D45-620/LB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
480 Wp
620 Wp
+140 W for JAM66D45-620/LB
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.00 %
+1.10 pp for AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
Power density
240.9 Wp/m²
229.5 Wp/m²
+11.4 Wp/m² for AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
Open-circuit voltage
41.30 V
48.50 V
7.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.86 V
40.21 V
5.35 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.38 A
16.13 A
1.75 A apart
Current at max power
13.78 A
15.42 A
1.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
Mechanical
Dimensions
1757x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1757x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.992 m²
2.701 m²
0.709 m² apart
Weight
21.5 kg
33.1 kg
-11.6 kg for AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
Weight per kWp
44.8 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
-8.6 kg/kWp for AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
+13 yrs for AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#219
vs
#1,919
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw leads by 1,700 places
Power density
#230
vs
#2,191
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw leads by 1,961 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#535
vs
#7,289
AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw leads by 6,754 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,227
vs
#2,537
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 690 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MAH54Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MAH54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MAH54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A455-MAH54Mw
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw or JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.00%); AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw and JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB?
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw use vs JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB?
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw uses Back Contact cells; JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw and JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB?
AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw and JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 171 AIKO offers · See 391 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

