Skip to main content
MD-120BD-455 vs ME-132BD-655 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar MD-120BD-455 vs AE Solar ME-132BD-655

AE Solar MD-120BD-455
MD-120BD-455
455 Wp 21.11 % PERC Bifacial
VS
AE Solar ME-132BD-655
ME-132BD-655
655 Wp 21.11 % PERC Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

ME-132BD-655 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 200 W more power. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter MD-120BD-455 ME-132BD-655 Difference
Rated power 455 Wp 655 Wp 200 W more power
Weight 25.5 kg 37.0 kg 11.5 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 13.62 A 18.38 A 4.76 A apart
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 42.29 V 45.70 V 3.41 V apart
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Current at max power 12.86 A 17.42 A 4.56 A apart
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 35.38 V 37.60 V 2.22 V apart
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MD-120BD-455
15,020 kWh
ME-132BD-655
21,623 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,603 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MD-120BD-455 ME-132BD-655
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 455 W 655 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 431 W 622 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 407 W 588 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 383 W 555 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MD-120BD-455 ME-132BD-655 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 455 Wp 655 Wp +200 W for ME-132BD-655
Module efficiency 21.11 % 21.11 % Same
Power density 211.1 Wp/m² 211.1 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 42.29 V 45.70 V 3.41 V apart
Voltage at max power 35.38 V 37.60 V 2.22 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.62 A 18.38 A 4.76 A apart
Current at max power 12.86 A 17.42 A 4.56 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for ME-132BD-655
Mechanical
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Weight 25.5 kg 37.0 kg -11.5 kg for MD-120BD-455
Weight per kWp 56.0 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr - Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#9,339 vs #9,339
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#9,339 vs #9,348
MD-120BD-455 leads by 9 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489 vs #8,846
ME-132BD-655 leads by 1,643 places
Weight
#10,439 vs #10,764
MD-120BD-455 leads by 325 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,855 vs #2,898
ME-132BD-655 leads by 6,957 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 vs AE Solar ME-132BD-660
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 vs AE Solar AE ME-132 660W
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 vs AE Solar AE ME-132BD-660
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 vs AE Solar AE ME-132-660
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 vs AE Solar ME-132-660
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 vs AE Solar AE ME-132 655W
13 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar MD-120BD-455 or AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
According to our database: AE Solar ME-132BD-655 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar MD-120BD-455 and AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 has a module efficiency of 21.11%, while AE Solar ME-132BD-655 is 21.11%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar MD-120BD-455 use vs AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 uses PERC cells; AE Solar ME-132BD-655 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar MD-120BD-455 and AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
AE Solar MD-120BD-455 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar ME-132BD-655 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar MD-120BD-455 and AE Solar ME-132BD-655 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar MD-120BD-455 and AE Solar ME-132BD-655 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.