AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
VS
The verdict
CME-132BDS-725 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 100 W more power. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CMER-132BDS-625
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Rated power
625 Wp
725 Wp
100 W more power
Weight
33.7 kg
37.0 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
16.06 A
18.46 A
2.40 A apart
Module area
2.700 m²
3.103 m²
0.403 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.16 %
23.37 %
0.21 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
14.99 A
17.47 A
2.48 A apart
Dimensions
2383x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CMER-132BDS-625
20,970 kWh
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CMER-132BDS-625
CME-132BDS-725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
598 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
571 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
543 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CMER-132BDS-625
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
725 Wp
+100 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency
23.16 %
23.37 %
+0.21 pp for CME-132BDS-725
Power density
231.5 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.90 V
49.30 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.70 V
41.50 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.06 A
18.46 A
2.40 A apart
Current at max power
14.99 A
17.47 A
2.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
2.700 m²
3.103 m²
0.403 m² apart
Weight
33.7 kg
37.0 kg
-3.3 kg for CMER-132BDS-625
Weight per kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
-2.9 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-725
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,533
vs
#968
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 565 places
Power density
#1,541
vs
#961
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 580 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,145
vs
#4,406
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 3,739 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#428
vs
#11
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 417 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 23.16%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 has a module efficiency of 23.16%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.