Skip to main content
CME-132BDS-730 vs RCM-725-8DBNM 17 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
CME-132BDS-730
730 Wp 23.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
Recom
RCM-725-8DBNM
725 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

CME-132BDS-730 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.23 pp more efficient. 17 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 2 differences
How alike are they
17 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

2 of 19 parameters
Parameter CME-132BDS-730 RCM-725-8DBNM Difference
Module efficiency 23.53 % 23.30 % 0.23 pp more efficient
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132BDS-730
24,493 kWh
RCM-725-8DBNM
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132BDS-730 RCM-725-8DBNM
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 698 W 693 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 666 W 662 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 635 W 630 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132BDS-730 RCM-725-8DBNM Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 725 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.53 % 23.30 % +0.23 pp for CME-132BDS-730
Power density 235.3 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 49.41 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 41.27 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 18.64 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.51 A 17.57 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.103 m² 3.106 m² Effectively the same
Weight 37.0 kg 37.8 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#707 vs #1,057
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 350 places
Power density
#705 vs #974
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 269 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,133 vs #5,649
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 1,516 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7 vs #14
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 7 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 or Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has higher module efficiency (23.53% vs 23.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a module efficiency of 23.53%, while Recom RCM-725-8DBNM is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 use vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 uses TOPCon cells; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare AE Solar and Recom as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers · See 2 Recom offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.