AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar AE ME-132 655W
VS
The verdict
CME-132BDS-725 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.26 pp more efficient. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
10 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CME-132BDS-725
AE ME-132 655W
Difference
Module efficiency
23.37 %
21.11 %
2.26 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
725 Wp
655 Wp
70 W more power
Power density
233.7 Wp/m²
211.1 Wp/m²
22.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight
37.0 kg
31.5 kg
5.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
45.70 V
3.60 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
48.1 kg/kWp
2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
41.50 V
37.60 V
3.90 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
AE ME-132 655W
21,977 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,348 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CME-132BDS-725
AE ME-132 655W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
655 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
693 W
622 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
662 W
588 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
630 W
555 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CME-132BDS-725
AE ME-132 655W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
655 Wp
+70 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency
23.37 %
21.11 %
+2.26 pp for CME-132BDS-725
Power density
233.7 Wp/m²
211.1 Wp/m²
+22.6 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
45.70 V
3.60 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.50 V
37.60 V
3.90 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.46 A
18.38 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.47 A
17.42 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for CME-132BDS-725
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
Same
Module area
3.103 m²
3.103 m²
Same
Weight
37.0 kg
31.5 kg
-5.5 kg for AE ME-132 655W
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
48.1 kg/kWp
-2.9 kg/kWp for AE ME-132 655W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#968
vs
#9,339
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 8,371 places
Power density
#961
vs
#9,348
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 8,387 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#8,846
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 6,626 places
Weight
#4,406
vs
#2,058
AE ME-132 655W leads by 2,348 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11
vs
#950
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 939 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 or AE Solar AE ME-132 655W?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 21.11%); AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar AE ME-132 655W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W is 21.11%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 use vs AE Solar AE ME-132 655W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar AE ME-132 655W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar AE ME-132 655W bifacial panels?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.