Skip to main content
CME-132BDS-725 vs AE ME-132 650W 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar AE ME-132 650W

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
CME-132BDS-725
725 Wp 23.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar AE ME-132 650W
AE ME-132 650W
650 Wp 20.95 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

CME-132BDS-725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.42 pp more efficient. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter CME-132BDS-725 AE ME-132 650W Difference
Module efficiency 23.37 % 20.95 % 2.42 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 725 Wp 650 Wp 75 W more power
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 209.5 Wp/m² 24.2 Wp/m² higher
Weight 37.0 kg 31.5 kg 5.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 45.50 V 3.80 V apart
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 37.40 V 4.10 V apart
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 48.5 kg/kWp 2.6 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
AE ME-132 650W
21,809 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,516 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132BDS-725 AE ME-132 650W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 650 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 693 W 617 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 662 W 584 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 630 W 551 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132BDS-725 AE ME-132 650W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 650 Wp +75 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency 23.37 % 20.95 % +2.42 pp for CME-132BDS-725
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 209.5 Wp/m² +24.2 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725
Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 45.50 V 3.80 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 37.40 V 4.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.46 A 18.32 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.47 A 17.38 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for CME-132BDS-725
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 37.0 kg 31.5 kg -5.5 kg for AE ME-132 650W
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 48.5 kg/kWp -2.6 kg/kWp for AE ME-132 650W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#968 vs #10,058
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 9,090 places
Power density
#961 vs #10,019
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 9,058 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #8,846
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 6,626 places
Weight
#4,406 vs #2,301
AE ME-132 650W leads by 2,105 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11 vs #1,141
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 1,130 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 or AE Solar AE ME-132 650W?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 20.95%); AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar AE ME-132 650W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar AE ME-132 650 W is 20.95%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 use vs AE Solar AE ME-132 650W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE ME-132 650 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar AE ME-132 650W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE ME-132 650 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar AE ME-132 650W bifacial panels?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE ME-132 650 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.