AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 vs AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625
VS
The verdict
8 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 85 W more power. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CME-132BDS-710
CMER-132BDS-625
Difference
Rated power
710 Wp
625 Wp
85 W more power
Weight
37.0 kg
33.7 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
18.37 A
16.06 A
2.31 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
2.700 m²
0.403 m² apart
Module efficiency
22.88 %
23.16 %
0.28 pp more efficient
Current at max power
17.36 A
14.99 A
2.37 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
48.70 V
49.90 V
1.20 V apart
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2383x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132BDS-710
23,822 kWh
CMER-132BDS-625
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,852 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CME-132BDS-710
CMER-132BDS-625
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
710 W
625 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
679 W
598 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
648 W
571 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
617 W
543 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CME-132BDS-710
CMER-132BDS-625
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
710 Wp
625 Wp
+85 W for CME-132BDS-710
Module efficiency
22.88 %
23.16 %
+0.28 pp for CMER-132BDS-625
Power density
228.8 Wp/m²
231.5 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
48.70 V
49.90 V
1.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.90 V
41.70 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.37 A
16.06 A
2.31 A apart
Current at max power
17.36 A
14.99 A
2.37 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2383x1133x30 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
2.700 m²
0.403 m² apart
Weight
37.0 kg
33.7 kg
-3.3 kg for CMER-132BDS-625
Weight per kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,578
vs
#1,533
CMER-132BDS-625 leads by 1,045 places
Power density
#2,490
vs
#1,541
CMER-132BDS-625 leads by 949 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,630
vs
#8,145
CME-132BDS-710 leads by 2,515 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#59
vs
#428
CME-132BDS-710 leads by 369 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 or AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625?
According to our database: AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 has higher module efficiency (23.16% vs 22.88%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 and AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 has a module efficiency of 22.88%, while AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 is 23.16%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 use vs AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 and AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 and AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 and AE Solar CMER-132BDS-625 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.