Skip to main content
AE MD-120 460W vs ME-132BD-655 3 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AE MD-120 460W vs AE Solar ME-132BD-655

AE Solar AE MD-120 460W
AE MD-120 460W
460 Wp 21.35 % TOPCon
VS
AE Solar ME-132BD-655
ME-132BD-655
655 Wp 21.11 % PERC Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

AE MD-120 460W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 195 W more power. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
3 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

15 of 18 parameters
Parameter AE MD-120 460W ME-132BD-655 Difference
Rated power 460 Wp 655 Wp 195 W more power
Weight 22.5 kg 37.0 kg 14.5 kg lighter
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs 15 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp 7.6 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 13.67 A 18.38 A 4.71 A apart
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 42.60 V 45.70 V 3.10 V apart
Module efficiency 21.35 % 21.11 % 0.24 pp more efficient
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Current at max power 12.92 A 17.42 A 4.50 A apart
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Voltage at max power 35.60 V 37.60 V 2.00 V apart
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AE MD-120 460W
15,186 kWh
ME-132BD-655
21,623 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,437 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AE MD-120 460W ME-132BD-655
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 655 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 436 W 622 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 412 W 588 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 388 W 555 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AE MD-120 460W ME-132BD-655 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 655 Wp +195 W for ME-132BD-655
Module efficiency 21.35 % 21.11 % +0.24 pp for AE MD-120 460W
Power density 213.5 Wp/m² 211.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 42.60 V 45.70 V 3.10 V apart
Voltage at max power 35.60 V 37.60 V 2.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.67 A 18.38 A 4.71 A apart
Current at max power 12.92 A 17.42 A 4.50 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for ME-132BD-655
Mechanical
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Weight 22.5 kg 37.0 kg -14.5 kg for AE MD-120 460W
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp -7.6 kg/kWp for AE MD-120 460W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs +15 yrs for AE MD-120 460W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr - Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#8,528 vs #9,339
AE MD-120 460W leads by 811 places
Power density
#8,487 vs #9,348
AE MD-120 460W leads by 861 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489 vs #8,846
ME-132BD-655 leads by 1,643 places
Weight
#2,595 vs #10,764
AE MD-120 460W leads by 8,169 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,117 vs #2,898
ME-132BD-655 leads by 3,219 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-120 460W vs AE Solar ME-132BD-660
14 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-120 460W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 660W
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-120 460W vs AE Solar AE ME-132BD-660
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-120 460W vs AE Solar AE ME-132-660
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-120 460W vs AE Solar ME-132-660
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-120 460W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 655W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AE MD-120 460W or AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
According to our database: AE Solar AE MD-120 460 W has higher module efficiency (21.35% vs 21.11%); AE Solar ME-132BD-655 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE MD-120 460W and AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
AE Solar AE MD-120 460 W has a module efficiency of 21.35%, while AE Solar ME-132BD-655 is 21.11%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE MD-120 460W use vs AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
AE Solar AE MD-120 460 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar ME-132BD-655 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE MD-120 460W and AE Solar ME-132BD-655?
AE Solar AE MD-120 460 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar ME-132BD-655 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE MD-120 460W and AE Solar ME-132BD-655 bifacial panels?
AE Solar ME-132BD-655 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE MD-120 460 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.