AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655
VS
The verdict
ICME-132BDS-655 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.37 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
3 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE ICME-132BDS-645
ICME-132BDS-655
Difference
Module efficiency
23.88 %
24.25 %
0.37 pp more efficient
Power density
238.8 Wp/m²
242.5 Wp/m²
3.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
645 Wp
655 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
AE ICME-132BDS-645
21,641 kWh
ICME-132BDS-655
21,977 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE ICME-132BDS-645
ICME-132BDS-655
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
645 W
655 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
620 W
629 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
595 W
604 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
570 W
578 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE ICME-132BDS-645
ICME-132BDS-655
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
645 Wp
655 Wp
+10 W for ICME-132BDS-655
Module efficiency
23.88 %
24.25 %
+0.37 pp for ICME-132BDS-655
Power density
238.8 Wp/m²
242.5 Wp/m²
+3.7 Wp/m² for ICME-132BDS-655
Open-circuit voltage
49.62 V
49.82 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.88 V
41.08 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.46 A
16.62 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.78 A
15.94 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
33.5 kg
33.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
51.9 kg/kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
Back Contact
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#394
vs
#171
ICME-132BDS-655 leads by 223 places
Power density
#356
vs
#172
ICME-132BDS-655 leads by 184 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,361
vs
#4,503
ICME-132BDS-655 leads by 858 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,084
vs
#718
ICME-132BDS-655 leads by 366 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-650
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-645
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 or AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655?
According to our database: AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655 has higher module efficiency (24.25% vs 23.88%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655?
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 has a module efficiency of 23.88%, while AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655 is 24.25%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 use vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655?
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 uses Back Contact cells; AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655 uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655?
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645 and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.