Skip to main content
CME-132 720 vs CMD-144BDS-595 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595

AE Solar AE CME-132 720
AE CME-132 720
720 Wp 23.21 % TOPCon Incomplete
VS
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595
AE CMD-144BDS-595
595 Wp 23.05 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

CME-132 720 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter CME-132 720 CMD-144BDS-595 Difference
Rated power 720 Wp 595 Wp 125 W more power
Weight per kWp 43.8 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 8.4 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 18.43 A 14.61 A 3.82 A apart
Module area 3.103 m² 2.581 m² 0.522 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 52.30 V 3.20 V apart
Current at max power 17.43 A 13.69 A 3.74 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Voltage at max power 41.30 V 43.46 V 2.16 V apart
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132 720
24,157 kWh
CMD-144BDS-595
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,194 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132 720 CMD-144BDS-595
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 595 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 689 W 569 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 657 W 543 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 626 W 517 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132 720 CMD-144BDS-595 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 595 Wp +125 W for CME-132 720
Module efficiency 23.21 % 23.05 % Effectively the same
Power density 232.1 Wp/m² 230.5 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 52.30 V 3.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.30 V 43.46 V 2.16 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.43 A 14.61 A 3.82 A apart
Current at max power 17.43 A 13.69 A 3.74 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
Module area 3.103 m² 2.581 m² 0.522 m² apart
Weight 31.5 kg 31.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 43.8 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp -8.4 kg/kWp for CME-132 720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,342 vs #1,750
CME-132 720 leads by 408 places
Power density
#1,382 vs #1,743
CME-132 720 leads by 361 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#336 vs #5,590
CME-132 720 leads by 5,254 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#19 vs #911
CME-132 720 leads by 892 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CME-132 720 or AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has higher module efficiency (23.21% vs 23.05%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has a module efficiency of 23.21%, while AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 is 23.05%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CME-132 720 use vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 bifacial panels?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.