AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
VS
The verdict
CME-132BDS-725 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 130 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE CMD-144BDS-595
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Rated power
595 Wp
725 Wp
130 W more power
Weight
31.0 kg
37.0 kg
6.0 kg lighter
Module efficiency
23.05 %
23.37 %
0.32 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current
14.61 A
18.46 A
3.85 A apart
Module area
2.581 m²
3.103 m²
0.522 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
52.30 V
49.30 V
3.00 V apart
Power density
230.5 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
3.1 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power
13.69 A
17.47 A
3.78 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Dimensions
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Voltage at max power
43.46 V
41.50 V
1.96 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
AE CMD-144BDS-595
19,963 kWh
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,362 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE CMD-144BDS-595
CME-132BDS-725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
569 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
543 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
517 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE CMD-144BDS-595
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
725 Wp
+130 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency
23.05 %
23.37 %
+0.32 pp for CME-132BDS-725
Power density
230.5 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
+3.1 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725
Open-circuit voltage
52.30 V
49.30 V
3.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.46 V
41.50 V
1.96 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.61 A
18.46 A
3.85 A apart
Current at max power
13.69 A
17.47 A
3.78 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
2.581 m²
3.103 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
31.0 kg
37.0 kg
-6.0 kg for AE CMD-144BDS-595
Weight per kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,750
vs
#968
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 782 places
Power density
#1,743
vs
#961
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 782 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,590
vs
#4,406
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 1,184 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#911
vs
#11
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 900 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 23.05%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 has a module efficiency of 23.05%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.