Skip to main content
144 590W vs 144BDS-595 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595

AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W
AE CMD-144 590W
590 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Incomplete
VS
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595
AE CMD-144BDS-595
595 Wp 23.05 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

144 590W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 4.5 kg lighter. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 144 590W 144BDS-595 Difference
Weight 26.5 kg 31.0 kg 4.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 44.9 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 7.2 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
144 590W
19,796 kWh
144BDS-595
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 144 590W 144BDS-595
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 590 W 595 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 564 W 569 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 539 W 543 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 513 W 517 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 144 590W 144BDS-595 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 590 Wp 595 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.05 % Effectively the same
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 230.5 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 52.24 V 52.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.29 V 43.46 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.54 A 14.61 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.63 A 13.69 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1133x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm Same
Module area 2.581 m² 2.581 m² Same
Weight 26.5 kg 31.0 kg -4.5 kg for 144 590W
Weight per kWp 44.9 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp -7.2 kg/kWp for 144 590W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,591 vs #1,750
144BDS-595 leads by 841 places
Power density
#2,518 vs #1,743
144BDS-595 leads by 775 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#564 vs #5,590
144 590W leads by 5,026 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,011 vs #911
144BDS-595 leads by 100 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W vs AE Solar CMD-144BDS-595
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W vs AE Solar AE CMD-144 595W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W vs AE Solar AE CMD-144-595
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W vs AE Solar CMD-144-595
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W vs AE Solar AE CMD-144-590
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W vs AE Solar CMD-144-590
One difference: product warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W or AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 has higher module efficiency (23.05% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590 W has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 is 23.05%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W use vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595?
AE Solar AE CMD-144 590 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CMD-144 590W and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 bifacial panels?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-595 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CMD-144 590 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.