Skip to main content
ASM-M12-132-650 vs ASB-M10-144-525 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525

Adani Solar
ASM-M12-132-650
650 Wp 20.87 % PERC
VS
Adani Solar
ASB-M10-144-525
525 Wp 20.44 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

ASM-M12-132-650 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter ASM-M12-132-650 ASB-M10-144-525 Difference
Rated power 650 Wp 525 Wp 125 W more power
Weight 33.6 kg 28.0 kg 5.6 kg lighter
Module efficiency 20.87 % 20.44 % 0.43 pp more efficient
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.45 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 43.66 V 48.78 V 5.12 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.85 A 13.48 A 5.37 A apart
Module area 3.114 m² 2.567 m² 0.547 m² apart
Power density 208.7 Wp/m² 204.5 Wp/m² 4.2 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 37.32 V 41.34 V 4.02 V apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 12.73 A 4.71 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2390x1303x35 mm 2266x1133x35 mm 2390x1303x35 mm vs 2266x1133x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ASM-M12-132-650
21,066 kWh
ASB-M10-144-525
17,289 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,777 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ASM-M12-132-650 ASB-M10-144-525
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 525 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 617 W 498 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 584 W 471 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 551 W 445 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ASM-M12-132-650 ASB-M10-144-525 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 650 Wp 525 Wp +125 W for ASM-M12-132-650
Module efficiency 20.87 % 20.44 % +0.43 pp for ASM-M12-132-650
Power density 208.7 Wp/m² 204.5 Wp/m² +4.2 Wp/m² for ASM-M12-132-650
Open-circuit voltage 43.66 V 48.78 V 5.12 V apart
Voltage at max power 37.32 V 41.34 V 4.02 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.85 A 13.48 A 5.37 A apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 12.73 A 4.71 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2390x1303x35 mm 2266x1133x35 mm 2390x1303x35 mm vs 2266x1133x35 mm
Module area 3.114 m² 2.567 m² 0.547 m² apart
Weight 33.6 kg 28.0 kg -5.6 kg for ASB-M10-144-525
Weight per kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.45 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for ASB-M10-144-525
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#10,407 vs #11,632
ASM-M12-132-650 leads by 1,225 places
Power density
#10,373 vs #11,598
ASM-M12-132-650 leads by 1,225 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846 vs #8,846
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,104 vs #7,243
ASM-M12-132-650 leads by 2,139 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,974 vs #9,032
ASM-M12-132-650 leads by 5,058 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-645
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-640
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-630
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525 vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-640
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525 vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-635
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 or Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525?
According to our database: Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has higher module efficiency (20.87% vs 20.44%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has a module efficiency of 20.87%, while Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525 is 20.44%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 use vs Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 uses PERC cells; Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has a 30 years power warranty; Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525 bifacial panels?
Adani Solar ASB-M10-144-525 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.