Skip to main content
SG110CX vs Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT) 8 of 17 identical Swap Change inverters

Sungrow SG110CX vs Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT)

Sungrow SG110CX
Sungrow
SG110CX
100 kW 98.5 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
VS
Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT)
Fronius International
Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT)
99.99 kW 98.2 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

SG110CX leads on the differences that matter

The largest is max dc voltage: 100 V apart. 8 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 15 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
8 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

9 of 17 parameters
Parameter SG110CX Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT) Difference
Max DC voltage 1100 V 1000 V 100 V apart
Max AC power 110.00 kW 99.99 kW 10.01 kW apart
Weight 89.0 kg 103.0 kg 14.0 kg lighter
European efficiency 98.5 % 98.2 % 0.3 pp more efficient
Max AC current 158.8 A 151.5 A 7.3 A apart
Max operating temperature 60 °C 65 °C 5 °C more heat tolerant
Max efficiency 98.7 % 98.5 % 0.2 pp more efficient
Ingress protection IP66 IP65 IP66 vs IP65
Dimensions 660x1051x362 mm 755x1109x346 mm 660x1051x362 mm vs 755x1109x346 mm
02

Full specification

Parameter SG110CX Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT) Difference
AC output
Rated AC power 100.00 kW 99.99 kW Effectively the same
Max AC power 110.00 kW 99.99 kW 10.01 kW apart
Grid connection 3-phase 3-phase Same
Nominal AC voltage 400 V 400 V Same
Max AC current 158.8 A 151.5 A 7.3 A apart
PV input
Max PV power - 150.00 kW Not published by Sungrow
DC/AC ratio - 1.50 Not published by Sungrow
Max DC voltage 1100 V 1000 V 100 V apart
MPPT voltage range 200-1000 V - Not published by Fronius International
Start voltage 250 V - Not published by Fronius International
MPP trackers 9 - Not published by Fronius International
Strings per tracker 2 - Not published by Fronius International
Max input current per tracker 26.0 A - Not published by Fronius International
Efficiency
European efficiency 98.5 % 98.2 % +0.3 pp for SG110CX
Max efficiency 98.7 % 98.5 % +0.2 pp for SG110CX
CEC efficiency - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight 89.0 kg 103.0 kg -14.0 kg for SG110CX
Weight per kW 0.9 kg/kW 1.0 kg/kW Effectively the same
Dimensions 660x1051x362 mm 755x1109x346 mm 660x1051x362 mm vs 755x1109x346 mm
Ingress protection IP66 IP65 IP66 vs IP65
Cooling forced-air forced-air Same
Noise - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature 60 °C 65 °C +5 °C for Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT)
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi Yes Yes Same
Ethernet Yes Yes Same
Arc fault protection - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Integrated DC switch Yes Yes Same
Warranty
Warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
03

More useful comparisons

Open all inverters
Same type, similar size
Huawei
Sungrow SG110CX vs Huawei SUN2000-100KTL-M2
6 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Huawei
Sungrow SG110CX vs Huawei SUN2000-100KTL-M1 (@480 V)
5 differences, the largest is max ac current
Same type, similar size
SMA Solar
Sungrow SG110CX vs SMA Solar Sunny Highpower PEAK3 SHP 100-21
8 differences, the largest is mpp trackers
Same type, similar size
Fronius International
Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-P (ECO | 1 MPPT) vs Fronius Tauro ECO 99-3-D (Direct)
One difference: max ac current
04

Written summary

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.